Going to be hard to stop Irans nuke program

[SunTracker]

...without nuclear bunker busting bombs.

Expect airstrikes/war with Iran and North Korea in the next 4 years.

[lasersailor184]

100 years down the road, I honestly believe this presidency is going to be chalked up as a success in the history books.

[Otto]

Don't worry, John Kerry will ask the UN for help...

[Blooz]

If an enemy is dug in so deep that you'd need a nuclear bunker buster bomb to get him, couldn't you just weld the doors shut?

If you got into a situation that called for nuclear weapons, wouldn't a device placed directly on top of this super deep macho bunker do just as good?

Sounds like a liberal fantasy weapon to me. Kinda like "assault weapons" being different from ordinary weapons because of the way they look.

[moot]

F=MA?

[parker00]

Sounds like a liberal fantasy weapon to me.

Last time I checked the president is far from liberal, so where in the world did you get that it's a "liberal fantasy weapon"?

[SunTracker]

Kerry is talking about getting tough with Iran and North Korea for building nukes, yet he is cancelling Bush's bunker busting bomb (which happens to be nuclear).

[WhiteHawk]

Iran and N Korea are building nukes to defend themselves, from bush.
Rememberr the axis of evil drivel?  Kerry promises to use the UN to negotiate a settlement with N korea and Iran that is satisfactory to both parties and the US.  if the UN is involved, the bulk of the fatalities from a war, if it has to happen, wont be US troops.  
  You folks better teach your kids how to be a mechanic, because if there is one more war, the draft is comming back.  Bush and Cheney will not bat an eyelid before sending your sons and daughters to the meatgrinder for thier oil, errr, terrorists hunting.

[SunTracker]

WhiteHawk, you have revealed the truth, but now you are in danger.  Black helicopters are on the way to your location as we speak!

[Eagler]

HAHA

you think iran or the cheekbones in Nk is going to listen to skerry if they do not listen to bush?

LOL

you think maybe cause he's a big bad arse "war hero", able to gather record number of medals in a whole 4 months in country tour we be the pivot point??? Had to laugh everytime he ref that "I know what combat is cause ..." "I defended my country then..." what a ****..

LOL LOL LOL

gotta laugh at his plan to "secure" russian nuke material too ... specially after calling putin a monster during the debate ...
didn't say why his hero slick willie didn't gather up the same missing materials in the 8 years he had in the oral office ....

LOL LOL LOL

yeah, skerry "Won" last night ... that is why more "undecided" read dumbarse voters, stated that though they believe skerry won the "debate", they'd vote Bush as prez....
LOL LOL LOL
LOL LOL LOL
LOL LOL LOL

LANDSLIDE BUSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[GRUNHERZ]

Originally posted by WhiteHawk
Iran and N Korea are building nukes to defend themselves, from bush.
Rememberr the axis of evil drivel?  Kerry promises to use the UN to negotiate a settlement with N korea and Iran that is satisfactory to both parties and the US.  if the UN is involved, the bulk of the fatalities from a war, if it has to happen, wont be US troops.  
  You folks better teach your kids how to be a mechanic, because if there is one more war, the draft is comming back.  Bush and Cheney will not bat an eyelid before sending your sons and daughters to the meatgrinder for thier oil, errr, terrorists hunting.

Whush whoosh whop whop whoosh whaaap whooop

[Blooz]

Last time I checked the president is far from liberal, so where in the world did you get that it's a "liberal fantasy weapon"?

Kerry mentioned this weapon (nuclear bunker buster bomb) as if it could or would be used in conventional or guerrilla style warfare.

If such a thing actually exists, I got news for ya. It can't. It's a lie. A fallacy. Fantasy.  It's a name thrown out by a liberal to create fear. Nothing more. You could no more use such a weapon in the fight against terrorism than you could using regular nukes.

So why did he mention it?

Liberals did the same thing with "assault weapons", "cop killer" bullets,"street sweepers", "hanging chad", etc. Give it a dark sounding name and it becomes a threat.

If a war broke out in which such a weapon would be used there wouldn't be anyone left to see if the thing actually worked.

I wouldn't worry though. If Kerry becomes President he'll shut down the nuclear bunker buster bomb program and give that money to the terrorists as protection money to not attack us.

Yeah...that'll work.

[john9001]

Originally posted by WhiteHawk
  if the UN is involved, the bulk of the fatalities from a war, if it has to happen, wont be US troops.  
   

welcome to the real world;
the Korean War was a war "run" and supported by the UN, the USA provided 90% of the troops and 85% of the money.

the UN is a weak sister when it comes to fighting.

[Martlet]

Originally posted by SunTracker
Kerry is talking about getting tough with Iran and North Korea for building nukes, yet he is cancelling Bush's bunker busting bomb (which happens to be nuclear).

Heck, Kerry was talking about giving nuclear material to Iran to see if they could be trusted.

That's how NK got there nukes.

What a great plan.

[RTSigma]

Originally posted by moot
F=MA?

Don't forget F=MA x F x P

I think P will be in there heavily.