Author Topic: Update F4U-1A Ords Please  (Read 1571 times)

Offline TwinBoom

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
      • 39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"
Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« on: November 17, 2009, 06:21:32 PM »
TBs Sounds 
39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"NOSEART

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2009, 06:33:47 PM »
Bah. If they want to hangar-bang, let them takes the "scrubs" from the Corsair set.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline crazyivan

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3920
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2009, 06:35:44 PM »
2x 1000lbs. bombs hmm.  my vote is yes. :aok
POTW
"Atleast I have chicken!"- Leroy Jenkins

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15839
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2009, 06:54:46 PM »
1 torp?
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2009, 07:29:30 PM »
Torpedo would change the game dynamics, for the better imho.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2009, 10:42:08 PM »
I think the wing pylons were a very late field mod made on the 1A after the 1D came along. I'd say leave the 1A ordinance as it is, but give the 1D its center 2000lber to go along with the wing bombs and rockets (imagine trying to get THAT off a CV!)
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2009, 11:39:49 PM »
Just because it could be carried doesn't mean it ever was.

Seen the P-38 pics with a torp?  Or the Fw190?

B-26 carried torps externally, once.

Anything else?

wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2009, 12:23:00 AM »
Just because it could be carried doesn't mean it ever was.

Seen the P-38 pics with a torp? 

wrongway

Actually, yes I have.  Used to have a picture of a P-38 that was used to test the feasibility of carrying torpedoes but it was only a test and never went beyond that one test.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2009, 12:36:21 AM »
Just because it could be carried doesn't mean it ever was.

Seen the P-38 pics with a torp?  Or the Fw190?

B-26 carried torps externally, once.

Anything else?

wrongway



Cannot locate the picture I have of the FW-190 F-8/U2 with the Torpedo.   

As for the B-26, you are wrong.
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline batch

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 640
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2009, 02:33:36 AM »
As for the B-26, you are wrong.

I dont know of any other known records........ but there were 4 B26s carrying torps that were used in the Battle of Midway......... and at least one account suggests 2 torps hit their target
"theres nothin like wakin up with a Dickens Cider" - Dickens Fruit Stand

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2009, 03:11:27 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Cannot locate the picture I have of the FW-190 F-8/U2 with the Torpedo.   

As for the B-26, you are wrong.

Yep, those were the pictures I had.  Also had another picture of a P-38 with transport pods slung under each wing that could carry one person.  A pilot that was transported in one afterwards wished that the person that designed them was forced to ride in one so they would know what it was like being in Hell.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2009, 07:13:28 AM »
I dont know of any other known records........ but there were 4 B26s carrying torps that were used in the Battle of Midway......... and at least one account suggests 2 torps hit their target

There were two Squadrons of them in the Aleutians Campaign, as well as a couple of detachments from the 38th in Australia.   But this is going off of memory from books I've read a while ago and in my basement.
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Gabriel

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 207
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2009, 08:09:47 AM »
If they don't give F4U a torpedo it is probably because how much more irrelevant it would make the TBM. Not that this is a particularly good argument mind you,,,when people are smashing CVs with Lancasters with impossible  precision accuracy .

Offline vonKrimm

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2009, 09:00:37 AM »
Just because it could be carried doesn't mean it ever was.

Seen the P-38 pics with a torp?  Or the Fw190?

B-26 carried torps externally, once.

Anything else?

wrongway

well since you asked....Yes.  Can eliminate the situation were planes that never fought alongside each other removed from the game?  I mean we could have Japanese planes for the Bish, German/IT for the Nits, US/UK planes for the Rooks, I guess USSR planes for a new side (the Queens?).  I only suggest this since you are bangin on about what could have been done in WWII vs. what actually did occur.

So I say "yes" for the expanded ords. on the 1a


Fight Like a Girl

Offline Krupinski

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2085
      • Twitch
Re: Update F4U-1A Ords Please
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2009, 09:23:12 AM »
Just because it could be carried doesn't mean it ever was.

Seen the P-38 pics with a torp?  Or the Fw190?

B-26 carried torps externally, once.

Anything else?

wrongway