Author Topic: Gay Bishop Consecrated (Read 7888 times)

narsus · « **Reply #150 on:** November 04, 2003, 04:19:59 PM »

MrBlack

Quote

I smell BULLCHIT.
Like I said anyone can write a paper on anything.
It don't make it so!
And If that accured in nature too much there would be NO animales.(hint the studmuffins aint found a way to have babies yet)

Do the math it is simple no race wether it be the human or whatever will survive if there is no coupling between male and female.

I mean for crying out loud just look at human genitalia
It only FITS one way.

Sometimes I think God must be looking down at us and shaking his head

Last time I checked the bible was written on paper by man, through multiple languages (2 of which are dead). So how do you know the bible is correct or incorrect? Ever play grapevine in school or been to engrish.com, people interpret languages differently and it is very difficult to get the nuances of language even for people speaking it for years. There are Ten laws, rules, whatever of God.

As far as genitalia ever receive oral sex, that's sodomy in case you were wondering which according to the bible is a pretty major sin.

ONE: 'You shall have no other gods before Me.'

TWO: 'You shall not make for yourself a carved image--any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.'

THREE: 'You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.'

FOUR: 'Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.'

FIVE: 'Honor your father and your mother.'

SIX: 'You shall not murder.'

SEVEN: 'You shall not commit adultery.'

EIGHT: 'You shall not steal.'

NINE: 'You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.'

TEN: 'You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.'

All the rest was written by man, therefore all the rest is fallable. So looking at the "words of God" nothing in there says a damn thing about homosexuality, that was added by man's view. Which by your own admission can be crap.

lord dolf vader · « **Reply #151 on:** November 04, 2003, 04:20:47 PM »

p.s. guess who most samuri dated?

hint they carried swords

vorticon · « **Reply #152 on:** November 04, 2003, 04:29:20 PM »

Quote

TEN: 'You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.'

it should read

TEN: 'You shall not covet your neighbor's house;"

and if that is correct then its ok if its my ox donkey or male servant???

Sikboy · « **Reply #153 on:** November 04, 2003, 04:30:14 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by mrblack
Well the Bible calls it sodomy and it is wrong.

Damn, blowjobs are out too then? ****, I'm done for!

-Sik

narsus · « **Reply #154 on:** November 04, 2003, 04:32:19 PM »

I just did a quick search for it Vorticon, got it from a christian site.

mrblack · « **Reply #155 on:** November 04, 2003, 04:40:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by narsus
TEN: MALE servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.'

Whats that part about MALE servant?

crabofix · « **Reply #156 on:** November 04, 2003, 04:43:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by hblair
It's in the NT too.

Good Hblair, have been looking for someone who knew where to look, please give me the location, book and verses, in NT

mrblack · « **Reply #157 on:** November 04, 2003, 04:44:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Frogm4n
hey mr black i know some nice gay men that would like to meet you for a hot time on the town. Might as well come out of the closet dude.

LOL:rofl

hblair · « **Reply #158 on:** November 04, 2003, 04:52:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crabofix
Good Hblair, have been looking for someone who knew where to look, please give me the location, book and verses, in NT

For starters...
Rom 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Frogm4n · « **Reply #159 on:** November 04, 2003, 05:19:22 PM »

for starters the bible is a joke that has been rewritten and poorly translated by 100's of people of the years. Its just a collection of fairy tales to help primitive minds deal with the world around them. If you need it to help you get through life, great whatever. Just dont try and justify killing people with it.

Kieran · « **Reply #160 on:** November 04, 2003, 05:27:52 PM »

Now Hblair, don't go disproving the argument God only disapproved of homosexuality in the Old Testament. That wouldn't be nice.

Are you up to refuting the "Cliff's Notes" collection of commonly used Bible phrases thrown together out of context? I have to admit, that is a rut we get into so often here.

Elfie · « **Reply #161 on:** November 04, 2003, 05:31:09 PM »

Quote

for starters the bible is a joke that has been rewritten and poorly translated by 100's of people of the years.

How do you know this Frogman? Just curious.

Kieran · « **Reply #162 on:** November 04, 2003, 05:34:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lord dolf vader
gay thing who cares? all your hateing them gives them power over you. and will continue to do so till you stop hateing. it will probly never happen but its the truth.

and kieren stop looking to the bible to find justifications of your oppinions. in effect you have raised your oppinions to the level of commandments. that aint right.

The Christian stance isn't to hate homosexuals, it's to turn away from sin. Homosexuality is a sin. Just as with any other sin, Christians are supposed to witness and explain God's Word and intent. If that sounds like hate to you, what can I say?

Where should a person of faith look to find justification for opinions of this nature, hmm? Sorry, but that's the way it works. And it IS right.

Vulcan · « **Reply #163 on:** November 04, 2003, 05:52:25 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mighty1
You know I've never looked at it like that before....they arnt mentally ill good argument you've convinced me. I think I'll go right out and get butt fvcked.

BTW I may be a simpleton but at least I know how to use a spell checker.

OMG sig material!

p.s it is "aren't"

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #164 on:** November 04, 2003, 06:00:25 PM »

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for starters the bible is a joke that has been rewritten and poorly translated by 100's of people of the years.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote

Originally posted by Elfie
How do you know this Frogman? Just curious.

A shrub in the forest uttered the truth to him as it was consumed by fire, but not destroyed.

>end of joke

>>start of a basic truth

Athiesm is a faith in the non-existance of a diety.

Thiestic thought is a faith in His existance.

Agnosticism is a realization that one cannot sucessfully resolve the basic is he or isn't he question.

To believe in the nonexistance of God is just as illogical in the belief in Him.

Arguement is based upon logic and religious belief is based upon faith. You cannot sucessfully argue faith as the two thought processes (logic and faith) are mutually exclusive. This thread as it is presently going is pointless.