Author Topic: Gartner and Linux (Read 441 times)

Swoop · « **on:** November 22, 2003, 08:33:21 AM »

http://www3.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=118545

So, wadda ya reckon then? This could mean big changes.

maslo · « **Reply #1 on:** November 22, 2003, 03:55:33 PM »

hehe they are just teethless dogs...

bill was also trolling last week that he is gonna pay some hackers, to prove that linux is dangerous.... and few hours after another blast like seccurity holle in Win was announced

IBM started to fully cooperate with linux developers..

just look around, how many IIS is running today .. may be 1% ?

they are almost out of game, only IBM noted, wheres future

anyway SCO never proved anything of that.... and pice of code, whitch they made public, just to prove its same, was so bad, that it would not even compile nor work

anyway how is SCO doing ? Do they sales grow ?

orel

Vulcan · « **Reply #2 on:** November 22, 2003, 07:59:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by maslo
hehe they are just teethless dogs...

bill was also trolling last week that he is gonna pay some hackers, to prove that linux is dangerous.... and few hours after another blast like seccurity holle in Win was announced

Why pay anyone? There are security exploit alerts every week for linxus. Its not like its any more secure than the various Windows servers. Even so called 'hardened' versions of Linux for firewalls have plenty of issues.

maslo · « **Reply #3 on:** November 23, 2003, 03:36:11 AM »

may be some link vulcan ? im specialy interesting in exploits for FWs

yup i noted some.. but not plenty

takeda · « **Reply #4 on:** November 23, 2003, 05:23:29 AM »

Windows with a moron administrator = insecure
Linux with a moron administrator = insecure

moronic Windows admins > moronic Linux admins

The last paper from Garter about the SCO suit means translated from "corporatese":
"SCO are smoking crack, and will get pwned badly, don't pay a dime and not much attention, they stink, stay away from them".

maslo · « **Reply #5 on:** November 23, 2003, 07:59:10 AM »

lol takeda ... btw BlablaSoft will never let linux fall, coz Xbox run on linux

(and im not sure about play station2)

thats why they do only baaa baaa instead of try to ban it

Nilsen · « **Reply #6 on:** November 23, 2003, 10:15:10 AM »

My only reason for having a copy of wIndowS around is AH.

Mini D · « **Reply #7 on:** November 23, 2003, 10:23:20 AM »

LINUX may only have 1% of the server share, but 1% of that market equates to 100% of the HomePC share as far as value goes. And, it has to potential to grow. The server market has traditionally been slow on the uptake with new ideas. Nobody wants to risk change. But the more people show it to be successful, the more will give it a shot.

MiniD

Vulcan · « **Reply #8 on:** November 23, 2003, 11:47:50 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by maslo
may be some link vulcan ? im specialy interesting in exploits for FWs

yup i noted some.. but not plenty

If you don't know where to find them you obviously don't know much about security.

maslo · « **Reply #9 on:** November 23, 2003, 02:07:13 PM »

hehe Vulcan i realy dont know much about security, im only messing about L2,L3,L4

i will be glad to have a look at your stuff .. packet storm is quite out of date