Khadafi = Peacemaker

[Fishu]

Obviously Bush missed the label 'Libya' on the map and thought the area was also a part of Iraq, since he was definately a bit lost on his crusade for WMD... terrori... erm.. I mean freedom.

Attacking Libya, now thats something I could've justified with all the reasons Bush has been hyping the Iraq war for: WMD, terrorists and 'freedom'.

[SirLoin]

When is the USA going to renounce WMD?

[Toad]

Never.

[SaburoS]

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
renounces WMD's and will give them up...

wonder why...

Reagan gave him a reason to change with a "little" F111 raid that almost killed him. He lost his baby though. Since then, Libya seemed a bit quiet on the "terrorism" front.

[Creamo]

Originally posted by Krusher
They said he has been in secret negotiations for 8 months now...

Timing?

Timing indeed. It coincided with the video of Saddam being drug out of a hole and getting his teeth examined.

[Tuomio]

Originally posted by SirLoin
When is the USA going to renounce WMD?

As soon as France will, which means never.

[StSanta]

Originally posted by Creamo
Timing indeed. It coincided with the video of Saddam being drug out of a hole and getting his teeth examined.

Heh yeah Creamo. Whatever one might think about the US going to war, there are some SWEET consequences.

"D00dz. We'll $n|p3 y00 if you get outta line. Blame lag or whatever, you'll still be $n|p0r3D".

I'm enjoying the side effects very much. Who's next in line for explaining that they really aren't that bad after all?

I really like that now dictators and tyrants around the world feel vulnerable, coz if the Yankees so decide, they'll be taken care of

[Scootter]

Originally posted by StSanta
Heh yeah Creamo. Whatever one might think about the US going to war, there are some SWEET consequences.

"D00dz. We'll $n|p3 y00 if you get outta line. Blame lag or whatever, you'll still be $n|p0r3D".

I'm enjoying the side effects very much. Who's next in line for explaining that they really aren't that bad after all?

I really like that now dictators and tyrants around the world feel vulnerable, coz if the Yankees so decide, they'll be taken care of

huh?

[Toad]

BBC News:

The UK Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, speaking on the BBC's Today programme, applauded what he called Colonel Gaddafi's "huge statesmanship and courage".

He said a team of experts which had paid visits to Libya in October and earlier this month had been given access to projects at more than 10 sites, including at least one involving uranium enrichment.

They had discovered that:


Libya had not acquired a nuclear weapons capability, but was close to developing one.

It had significant quantities of chemical agent and bombs designed to be filled with chemical agent.

There were research centres with the potential to support biological weapons-related work.

Facilities existed where missile research development work had been conducted.

San Francisco Chronicle

The Libyans had chemical weapons and medium-range missiles from North Korea and, at a minimum, a program to make uranium for nuclear weapons. U.S. intelligence agencies lack information that Libya had enriched the uranium to make a nuclear weapon or possessed biological weapons. For all the Libyan cooperation, officials acknowledged there still could be undisclosed weapons and programs.

So far, the United States has learned that Libya had:

* Tens of tons of mustard agent, a World War I-era chemical weapon, produced about 10 years ago.

* Aircraft bombs capable of dispersing the mustard agent in combat.

* A supply of Scud-C ballistic missiles made in North Korea. The weapons can hit targets 500 miles away.

CNN :

"I think we have to learn what did they (Libya) have. They say that they will adhere to the Non-Proliferation Treaty for nuclear weapons.They are already party to that treaty and they have had inspections for years," said Blix, interviewed in Sweden.

[majic]

"they have had inspections for years"

[SaburoS]

Originally posted by GScholz
Actually this is wrong. Libya increased its support of terrorism after the bombing, only after extensive US and UN sanctions started to affect Libya did they back off.

The Lockerbie bombing for instance was two years after the US bombed and killed Gaddafi's baby daughter. So the 1986 bombing of Libya was a failure as it did not stop Libyan terrorism, but encouraged it.

OOPS, losing track of dates in my memory. So, was that PanAm bombing retaliation against the F111 bombing?

[GRUNHERZ]

WE DID IT!!!!!!

Years and years of singing kumbaya and give peace a chance at candlelight antiwar and anti-WMD rallies and constantly blaming the wast and the USA for everything have convinced Gadhaffi to give up his weapons!!!!!

WE DID IT!!!!!

BTW: The violent deposition of the Taliban, Saddams regime and the increasing US diplomatic pressure and attention on Iran and North Korea by the EVIL Bush regime had no impact whatsover on this stunning change of heart by our dear peaceloving Col. Gadhaffi...

Signed:

Leftists, domestic commies (who always, convenitaly, asked for unilateral disarmement by west during the cold war), socialists, hollywood stars, residents and dwellers of Berkely California and others..

Oh yea gotta love Bushspeak:

"Otherwise Unwelcome Consequences"

[StSanta]

Wow Grünherz, finally a post I sorta agree on and one that doesn't leave me with a desire to kick green hearts in the nuts!

Well done, Euro-trash-who-ran-away-to-the-ehvl-Amreekhans-boy!

Heh, your post was actually quite funny . And not even a "Eurorutabagas" anywhere in there. You're slipping, friend

Oh yeah, since I'm a Euro-Macho-man:

DETH TO AMREEKHA! LONG LIVE ZE FOURZ REICH, CALLED THE EU!

[GRUNHERZ]

Yoho!

BTW: Please, please fix that avatar....

[StSanta]

There, modified it.

Damn, you can really be a nagging b|tch, you know that?

And I had that avatar first! PTFFFH!

Have a great X-mas bud