10bears not at all....but having and still serve over in that area of the world the things that Clark did well....lets just say the guys that had few choice comments about Clark were correct. And after spending countless hours getting shot at from the POS's on the ground...lets just say I have a bit of insight on the whole issue that others might not.....
Hugh Shelton talked about integrity issues but never went into detail about what these issues were. You seem to be doing the same thing. While spending countless hours getting shot at, were any of your American G.I. buddies killed in action?..
What Shelton might be getting at here, and from what I’ve read, Clark bucked the Pentagon on several occasions -- Bringing in the choppers, timing of troop deployment that sort of thing. He thought outside the box. Is that bad for the military?. Yes. Is that bad for the Presidency? NO. The President should be someone that can see the big picture.
Wining a war in Europe without losing a single solider in combat ought to mean something. Being first in your class at West Point should rank a little higher than being a C+ legacy student at Yale. Serving your country in uniform for 34 years shows more honor and character than someone spending 22 years dead drunk wouldn’t you agree Mr. Guttboy?
No. The G.O.P. is doing everything they can to see to it Clark is not the candidate. I was just watching Fox news,.. the talking heads were saying Dean is the frontrunner and Leberman and all the rest of the pack are far behind. They’re careful not the mention Clarks name. Now why is that?.. Over on the Freeper board, they’re talking about switching over to democrat just to vote for Dean in the primary. I wouldn’t be surprised to find out the G.O.P. were contributing money to the Dean campaign.
If enough people were able to educate Dean supporters and middle of the road Republicans that Wes Clark was the man for the job.. In spite of the Neocons best efforts Clark becomes the Democratic candidate, Bush will be in for a long hard slosh.
