Author Topic: Kitna Persecuted? (Read 298 times)

midnight Target · « **on:** December 31, 2003, 06:35:10 PM »

Obviously not, but I am surprised that the religious right hasn't tried to score on this one.

Kitna fined for wearing cap marked with cross

hyena426 · « **Reply #1 on:** December 31, 2003, 07:29:36 PM »

didnt they do the same thing about jim mcman wearing his sweat bands on the side lines?,,,hehe,,i think they take that stuff to far

but if your playing in nfl you got to go by there rules or pay the price,,lol

Mini D · « **Reply #2 on:** December 31, 2003, 07:52:32 PM »

Maybe someone will show up that will make more of an issue of this than you have MT. Hold out for that scapegoat.

MiniD

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #3 on:** December 31, 2003, 08:31:21 PM »

NFL is pretty consistent about this stuff. You wear the official logos or else. I suppose players could challenge the league rules on grounds of free speech, but the rules are part of the league's merchandising system which makes a crapload of money for the owners and the players, so I don't see it happening.

capt. apathy · « **Reply #4 on:** December 31, 2003, 08:32:49 PM »

stupid rule. but if he had a problem with it he should have brought it up before he signed his contract.

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #5 on:** December 31, 2003, 08:33:48 PM »

Or before he cashed his check from the NFLPA merchandising deal.

Raubvogel · « **Reply #6 on:** December 31, 2003, 10:20:26 PM »

Hasn't Kitna suffered enough with his suckiness?

Dawggus · « **Reply #7 on:** January 01, 2004, 09:49:39 AM »

Kitna actually had a great year on the field. The question is, will the Bengals let the $6 million Palmer earn his keep by holding a clipboard again next year

.

Cya Up!

Dawg