Originally posted by Halo
It costs an arm and a leg, but I'm pleased with Comcast cable both for computer and for TV. Finally splurged for Video On Demand, which like Tivo lets YOU control your TV schedule at your convenience in addition to freeing you from commercials.
Haven't tried recording DVDs on the setup, and doubt if I will, at least until the DVD standards settle down into one universal system.
Also waiting for HDTV sets to get MUCH more affordable. Meanwhile, the digital cable does provide a better picture than just analog. I don't think that's just hype -- the higher numbered digital channels look better to my eyes.
HAlo
digital will always be cleaner looking than analog channels. As soon as cable can go 100% digital, it will help all cable customers. You can fit at least 6 digital channels in 6mhz bandwidth one crappy analog now sucks up. Not to mention cleaner transmission the digital channels & fiber hubs allow. Everything is going On Demand. We have HBO, SHowtime, Cinemax to name a few on demand now. As bandwidth is available and VOD proves lucritive, you'll see more of it. Takes a good cable system to provide streaming video needed for a trouble free VOD system. Many systems aren't there yet.
All sat channels are digital, thus the superior quality over most cable co's. One good thing sats are doing is getting joe six pack away from the "Cable ready" tv set mentality...forcing him to use a set top box.
They just released the digital boxes with DVR built in. Can watch one channel while recording two others. Makes any tv picture in picture capable. Nice but not as fast or customer friendly as TIVO.
and if you think digital is good, wait until you get HD. We have about a dozen channels now on Hi-Def including inDemand shows.
and can't forget about Road Runner ... sats can't do that either

been a cable guy since 79 ... pre MTV (and most other programming)
