Revvin,
I don't think it was me, I can't remember that. Although I would not put my hand on fire on that, I think I did not fly a single B-17 this tour. I've flown, as far as I can recall, couple of TBM's, couple of B-26 (trying to defend a capped field

), and some Lancs (not more than 2, if my memory suits me well). I am talking by hart, but no, I don't think I was the dogfiter.
I am dweeb like most of us here, but there some things I DO NOT do: carbombing, off-the-map flying, and dogfiting with buffs, if I can possibly avoid (that is, I am not trying to defend the dreaded only-buff-hangar-up field

)
About the buff episode itself, yes, I admit it is as whiny as it seems. Sorry (again) for that. On the technical details, couple of things, bear in mind that I had to climb to 40 k to have some chance against him. At that hight, even the Ta is very, very lazy, unless you have quite a lot of smash.
Im no hot shot, but I regularly engage with buffs, since they are very dangerous to our beloved airfields & radar

, so I'm quite aware of "safe" procedures to get the bomber down.
I have MOST respect for buffers who take chances & fly on a historical basis. I can't say the same for strato-buffs, altho I can understand alt's another weapon. What I suggest is that weapon be treated like WEP. If you run your buff over safe altitude your crew would have to suffer and, eventually, if you do not go down to normal levels, could be disabled.
As far as history is concerned, I had the idea that 8th. Air Force bombardments were just a bit away of being stopped, due to hvy attrition from LW fiters. And I thought the hvy casualtyies were due to escorts, not buffs itself, save a couple of them. Anyone has sound data on this?
Side note: retirement, even at this early stages, is making wonders. The more I see my post, the more it qualifies as a whine

Cheers,
Pepe