Author Topic: Time to rethink  (Read 2299 times)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Time to rethink
« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2001, 08:16:00 AM »
LOL, flew a 10k B17 to A12 yesterday, a 109 easily shot me down with excellent tactics on his part both sorties...I never made it to target.

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
Time to rethink
« Reply #16 on: May 24, 2001, 09:11:00 AM »
Ah, another semi-whine that the B-17s ability to defend itself is unfair.  As a bomber dweeb, the B-17 has the best chance of the bunch to defend itself since it has so many guns.  

The Lanc's are dead meat since they only have 3 gun positions...unless the fighter is a tard and makes a dead-six approach, shooting down a Lanc is fairly easy.  

B-26s fair pretty well, since they are faster but with only 2 engines, they cant take the pounding of a 4-engine bomber (we just run out of engines    ).

Ju88s are slow and their guns are commonly referred to as "Daisy Red Ryders" or "Nerf" guns, as they are -that- effective LOL....if a Ju88 shoots you down, hang your head in disgrace and wear the dunce cap!  <JK!>  I did shoot a Niki down once in a Ju88, perhaps I used more than 10 pumps in the BB guns? hehe

Arados, well...they've got speed and that's it.  I don't know why I'm being shot down in them by Niki's tho...I was doing 400+, fired up the ratos and dived and one GAINED on me and shot me down.  Maybe he was the better pilot, I dunno....but I didnt think a Nik could go that fast.  

But anyways, I've seen this go back and forth...bomber guys like me upset that the fighters are mauling us, and reverse this, fighter guys upset that we're able to shoot them down.  Did it occur to you that maybe the bomber guy got lucky?  I shot down 6 guys in one sortie in a B17 a few days ago, there wasnt a lot left of me after that, but it was my best bomber flight to date.  

One thing that drives me insane is that if my pilot is wounded, the random black outs effect my gunners (hate that, 6 crew members and one guys wounds effect all!).  That's another disadvantage the bomber dweebs get.  

So in grand summary, Pepe, I wouldnt get to upset over the loss to the B-17.  The times I do fly fighters and take on a B17, I die since Im A)Not a good fighter dweeb and B) Am never patient enough to use tactics like 2-8 attacks.  Face it, the B-17 got you, and that happens.  I don't think its really worthy of a complaint and mild threat to leave Aces High  

 

------------------
Paul J. Busiere

Aces High Arena handle:  BD5Pilot
 http://bd5.checksix.net
BD-5 "T" (TurboProp) 90% complete, first flight in 2001 (We hope!)

Offline popeye

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Time to rethink
« Reply #17 on: May 24, 2001, 09:16:00 AM »
The B-17G has 3018 kills and has been killed 4208 times.
KONG

Where is Major Kong?!?

Offline Pepe

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1020
Time to rethink
« Reply #18 on: May 24, 2001, 09:40:00 AM »
Hehehe, no, this is not a threat, mild or not, to leave AH. I'm too hanged for that, and I usually do not say things that I can't comply with. It's just that, on the first post, I could not resist to vent after what I considered an unfair situation, and an unfair duel, If we are to credit what's written about Buffs & Fiters in WWII. I won't hesitate in chasing a lone Buff that is porking our land, even if it takes me my 70 perkies out and 40 minutes of my time, as I don't hesitate in doing the opposite, and dive after one of them.

That post was made yesterday night in anger. When I read it this morning, I realized that, altho the whining was wrong, my decision is right. I have to take a break, since posting like that reveals an improper attitude state. You guys deserve more from me than this poor show. And my free time deserve it as well. I fly here to have a good time, and have good friends. When I want to fight, really, that's what my work is for.  

On a more constructive way, and back to the usual Buff clubbing, I ended up thinking that the toned up .50's are a step in just the wrong direction. Currently I think that the real tweak needed would be having Norden Sight "improved", bombs (only in Buffs) really beefed up (and "this" being the gameplay concession) and .50's revamped, in terms of angles of fire, firepower, dispersion, etc. As well as having high-alt effects modelled, mind freezing. For instance, having the gun positions loosing his ability to traverse fast, and then randomly disabled if flying over 30k for more that 1 hour (this working somehow as the WEP time does, and bearing in mind new gun positions indications: red:disabled, blue: freezing, gray: freezing to death).

I mean, you leave a buff getting to your field, and you have the field toasted. No multiple passes, no jinking. Let's say 3 or 4 eggs render the field useless, and ready to capture.

Why?

  • Buff pilots know that if they make it to the target, they get the results.
  • Fighter pilots know that it's worth to intercept, both in terms of chances, and in terms of potential damage to their airfields.
  • Alt limit would be flexible enough to allow some strato-dweeb usage  , altho abusing from that would hamper severely the chances of surviving. And would be more close to the real thing.

  • Norden....well you know my position about that already, don't you?  
On a side note, this is like smoking....you know, any of you smokers can quit anytime you want....HA!

Cheers,

Pepe

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
Time to rethink
« Reply #19 on: May 24, 2001, 10:02:00 AM »
Well, if you are taking a break, I should see a few more of these.....

 

....landings!

 

Unwind, relax, and come back!



------------------
Paul J. Busiere

Aces High Arena handle:  BD5Pilot
 http://bd5.checksix.net
BD-5 "T" (TurboProp) 90% complete, first flight in 2001 (We hope!)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Time to rethink
« Reply #20 on: May 24, 2001, 10:42:00 AM »
Pepe, I agree, there are some days that I choose not to attack a B17 alone, due to the 'bite' of the guns, and the painful process of setting up the proper attack if I'm at co-alt or slightly below.

Offline LaVa

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Time to rethink
« Reply #21 on: May 24, 2001, 10:51:00 AM »
Pepe are you trying to hide from me and Hizakite  

Mandy -  cant let yer teammate run, yet.

Cyas up,

LaVa


Offline Revvin

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1724
      • http://www.ch-hangar.com
Time to rethink
« Reply #22 on: May 24, 2001, 11:06:00 AM »
What approach did you use to attack the B17? I've chewed up many players who think a dead six slow attack is the best, you say you dived out of the sun but I'm guessing you were not much above 38k yourself and certainly not doing much speed. If you use anything close to historical tactics against a bomber you will see him go down in flames, I'm not much of a shot but managed to down two B17's in one sortie a few nights ago in a P51 with plenty of ammo to spare.

Pepe posted:
 
Quote
In RL a single buff was dead meat for a lone fighter. Here it is quite the opposite

Whels1 posted:
 
Quote
they werent such a fortress without escorts, they were lambs to slaughter

Simply not true, the Luftwaffe took heavy casualties attacking B17's, they were respected as a salamanderly target even by Luftwaffe aces. They would have hradly nicknamed them the flying fortress and certainly not mass produced it if it had been such a weak aircraft. Many of the examples people like to bandy around these boards as examples of lone buffs getting eaten up by fighters are examples of bombers that had already taken near critical damage on the flight in or over target and not been able to maintain formation and dropped to much lower alt to limp home, by this time most of the gunenrs would be dead and flight controls severely damaged so for the marauding Luftwaffe pilots who saw such a bomber it would be like pulling the wings off a fly.

I sympathise with your plight against this stratto buff, I hate to see players game the game in this way. One of the rules of No.9 Squadron is to fly histroically as possible and that means our B17's don't go over 28k which was normal operating altitude and our Lancasters normally fly at 22k which again was the normal operating altitude for this aircraft. Its about time the bombers were given a complete overhaul in Aces High, time to look at things such as the guns, the gunnery system for buffs and the damage model as well as the damage done by the bombers ordnance. As an interim measure surely it is not beyond the capability of HTC to put a ceiling in for planes to stop them reaching unhistrorical altitudes, that goes for fighters too.

A small thought though before I go, Pepe was it not you that was dogfighting in a B17 a few nights ago against my Lancaster? If it was you it was one of the most dweeby things I've seen in a long time.

------------------
Revvin
No.9 Squadron RAF

Offline ET

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 325
Time to rethink
« Reply #23 on: May 24, 2001, 01:25:00 PM »
Its seems strange to me how some guys attack the buffs lethality yet many others kill them in one pass,Tactics ?
Last night I tried to B17 35 at 20k and got killed on one pass by a P51 screaming down from altitude.My squad mate tried to hit 35 at 15K and got killed by the same guy the same way.I went again but this time I went up to 28K.I got the ammo fuel barracks and also killed the same P51 pilot.I continued on to 35 and after the first pass,met a P51 and P38.After a duel I was lucky enough to get them both.P51 was the same guy as before.Because of the fighting it took me two more passes to take out the ammo fuel and barracks.Out of bombs,I headed home maintaining altitude because of the many enemy blips on screen.I always want to land the plane.After a bit,an nme blip kept getting closer and closer.I had plenty of fuel so I stayed up there.When he finally caught up to me over my home base,he circled low a few times and I finally got a lucky shot in and sent him down.Same P51,same pilot and a lot of persistance.He was as determined to get me as I was to bomb his base and land my plane.He had my foot jumping because I was so on edge with his manuevers.We passed salutes to each other and my respect for him was 100%.I did not whine when I died and he did not whine when he died.I enjoyed the flight although I ate up a lot of time.I think he enjoyed the chase although it ate up a lot of his time.When buffs get killed so easy at low altitudes,you leave them no choice but to go higher and that takes time,but its tactics.I do not think it has anything to do with the guns.It is the manner of attack of the individual fighter pilot and the individual bomber pilot.Some bomber pilots are good gunners too.Give them some credit.There are fighter guys that are very sucessful against bombers.I know.I have been killed by them in one pass many times.That is the game.

Offline Pepe

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1020
Time to rethink
« Reply #24 on: May 24, 2001, 04:13:00 PM »
Revvin,

I don't think it was me, I can't remember that. Although I would not put my hand on fire on that, I think I did not fly a single B-17 this tour. I've flown, as far as I can recall, couple of TBM's, couple of B-26 (trying to defend a capped field   ), and some Lancs (not more than 2, if my memory suits me well). I am talking by hart, but no, I don't think I was the dogfiter.

I am dweeb like most of us here, but there some things I DO NOT do: carbombing, off-the-map flying, and dogfiting with buffs, if I can possibly avoid (that is, I am not trying to defend the dreaded only-buff-hangar-up field   )

About the buff episode itself, yes, I admit it is as whiny as it seems. Sorry (again) for that. On the technical details, couple of things, bear in mind that I had to climb to 40 k to have some chance against him. At that hight, even the Ta is very, very lazy, unless you have quite a lot of smash.

Im no hot shot, but I regularly engage with buffs, since they are very dangerous to our beloved airfields & radar  , so I'm quite aware of "safe" procedures to get the bomber down.

I have MOST respect for buffers who take chances & fly on a historical basis. I can't say the same for strato-buffs, altho I can understand alt's another weapon. What I suggest is that weapon be treated like WEP. If you run your buff over safe altitude your crew would have to suffer and, eventually, if you do not go down to normal levels, could be disabled.

As far as history is concerned, I had the idea that 8th. Air Force bombardments were just a bit away of being stopped, due to hvy attrition from LW fiters. And I thought the hvy casualtyies were due to escorts, not buffs itself, save a couple of them. Anyone has sound data on this?

Side note: retirement, even at this early stages, is making wonders. The more I see my post, the more it qualifies as a whine  

Cheers,

Pepe

Offline Wlfgng

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5252
      • http://www.nick-tucker.com
Time to rethink
« Reply #25 on: May 24, 2001, 04:24:00 PM »
what timing. ...   1.07 is out now
so I guess you had a short vacation eh ?  

Offline Pepe

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1020
Time to rethink
« Reply #26 on: May 24, 2001, 04:26:00 PM »
Hehehe, no, LaVa, I won't leave my friend. Even if It was the most unpleasant thing (and it's quite the opposit) I had assumed the compromise of fiting the Loose Deuce ladder with him. Of course I will fly (and will do my best to make you a nice dotted flightsuit   )

Just let us know when  

Cheers,

Pepe

Offline Pollock

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 520
Time to rethink
« Reply #27 on: May 24, 2001, 04:48:00 PM »
People,

For bombers, go up in groups and lobby for escorts. Look me up I am always ready to scort bombers.  One on one lets hope the better skilled one wins.

For fighters pair up loose duece and make rapid slashing attacks.  Pepe I know how frustrating a satelite bomber can be.  I more despise the bomber pilot that flys the plane like a fighter, to each his own I guess.