Author Topic: Video cards!  (Read 1642 times)

Offline Weapon

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Video cards!
« Reply #15 on: January 28, 2004, 05:48:57 PM »
Caveman:

I just put a buget minded system together and I am happy with the results.

Starting with an Asus A7N8X-E with a Barton 2500+.  Set the bus speed to 200 and you have yourself a 3200+.  At this piont I bet all new Barton 2500+ are 3200+ packaged as 2500+.

My past 3 cards have been ATI. This time however I took a chance and bought a eVGA GeForce FX 5900 SE.  Applied a reg. hack to open up the overclocking feature built into the driver and have been happy with the results.  Both in performance and the effect the new system has had on  my wallet.  Res is turned up and I never see it drop below 75fps.  AH2 beta is never below 60fps.  Bought everything at New Egg and had a great experence.

I noticed Eagler wrote about desktop quality at higher resoulutions.  You have to remember he is looking at the screen with Eagle eyes.:) Non expert eyes like mine say it cost a hundred bucks less and therefor it looks great!

Hope this helps. If you can give up a few fps, the reward will be less of a hit on your hard earned dolloars.

Offline CavemanJ

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1008
Video cards!
« Reply #16 on: January 28, 2004, 06:12:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by zmeg
Even Tom's Hardware, which is heavily ATI biosed, rates the G4 TI 4200 as the best bang for the buck by a huge margin.


Been running on an Asus Ti4200, but it died (again) and I gotta send it back (again).  Was thinking about getting a Ti4600 or 4800, or maybe even one of the FX cards.  Put the Ti4200, when it comes back, in the old lady's machine.

Offline United

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2536
      • http://squadronspotlight.netfirms.com
Video cards!
« Reply #17 on: January 28, 2004, 10:22:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by guttboy
United,
 I got mine (ATI RADEON 9800 XT with 256 mb ram) for 500 smackers.

Thanks!  Little outta my budget for a video card though!

Offline Connection

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 141
Video cards!
« Reply #18 on: January 28, 2004, 11:39:29 PM »
$165 BFG FX 5900 @ BuyXtremeGear

Offline bloom25

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1675
Video cards!
« Reply #19 on: January 29, 2004, 06:56:25 PM »
Unfortunately the ATI/nVidia debate is anything but clear cut.  Here's my opinions on the subject:

1.  ATI's cards have significantly better image quality (I say that based on many experiences with both brands of cards recently).  This goes for both 2D (where it is greatest) and 3D.  ATI's antialiasing also works MUCH better than nVidia's.

2.  ATI's recent cards are generally overall slightly better performers than nVidia's cards with comparible price points.  AH2, however, currently does not run well on ATI 9500 and up cards though.  My Ti4200 performs better in AH2 than my Radeon 9800 does.  Considering that no other game I know of benchmarks results for, or have played on my machine, are the same I'm fairly certain this is a software issue with either ATIs drivers or AH2 itself.  I'm really hoping HT can find the reason before AH2 goes final.

3.  nVidia's drivers are still FAR superior to ATIs drivers.  It pains me to say that, but so far every new ATI driver version I've used (3.7s, 3.8s, 3.10s, 4.1s) all seem to break one game while they fix another.  To make matters worse, newer drivers sometimes reintroduce a bug that was fixed in a previous release or sometimes cause performance in one game to plummet.  At least there doesn't seem to be any major 2D application issues in ATIs drivers, as in the past where my experience with ATIs drivers were in a word - terrible.  (One Rage 128 driver version I tried about 3 years ago corrupted one of my Win2k machines to the point where a reinstall was necessary as it wouldn't even boot in safe mode.)  With nVidia's drivers, there's a good chance that installing a new game even with older drivers will not result in the game having too many issues to play.  With ATIs drivers, I can't say the same thing.  It seems like it takes at least 2 driver revisions to get rid of most of the bugs in any new game.  To ATI's credit, they have been releasing new drivers every month, so at least they are making an effort to address driver issues on a regular basis.  Unfortunately, I don't exactly like to be updating video drivers on a monthly basis without knowing for sure that the new set won't break something that worked in the previous version.  (I was joking with someone recently that ATI needs a "select video driver" prompt at bootup with the past 5 releases available... )  

All is not perfect with nVidia though, as their more recent drivers (40 and 50 series) are not nearly as good as the 30 series drivers were.  nVidia also seems to be sacrificing image quality for performance in an attempt to draw closer to ATI recently as well.  I can definately say that the IQ with my TI4200 card is notibly better with the 30.82 drivers than with the newer 40 and 50 series sets.  They also haven't been matching ATI in how quickly they resolve reported driver issues recently either.

So, basically what you are left with is:  ATI - superior hardware, nVidia - superior software.  Take your pick...

Offline 715

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Video cards!
« Reply #20 on: January 29, 2004, 08:45:15 PM »
Re ATI vs Nvidia:

It may certainly be my imagination, but when I changed from a GF3 Ti500 to a Radeon 9600XT I seem to notice more problems with Z-buffering, i.e. objects that should be behind other objects appear in front of them instead.  This is particularly annoying when trying to range targets in a tank as the dust from your shot appears in front of the target when the round actually hit behind it.

Then again, maybe it's my imagination.  Or perhaps there is some hidden Z-buffer resolution setting I am missing.

715

Offline Boat

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
      • http://None
Video cards!
« Reply #21 on: January 29, 2004, 08:55:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BB Gun
Best bang for the buck right now is NOT the radeon9600XT at 150-175 bucks, but....

http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?description=14-131-199&depa=1

radeon9700Pro for 200 bucks.

BB


To make it even more interesting, should you spend $202 on the 9700 Pro or up the ante to just $230 and get a 9800 Pro at Newegg?

Offline Rolex

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Video cards!
« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2004, 08:41:58 AM »
bloom25:

Thanks for all of your consistently competent and informed posts.
You're a high-value contributor.