Author Topic: How much of this about Kerry is true? (Read 2859 times)

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #15 on:** February 05, 2004, 01:50:40 PM »

No. He bought a trip to oxford. Err, one of those really "important" british colleges.

Grant wasn't a good general either. He was just famous.

Now, Meade was a good general, and did a lot of the work.

ra · « **Reply #16 on:** February 05, 2004, 01:55:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Raubvogel
He looks like a horse.
Never trust a man who looks like a horse.

He looks like Lurch. You can trust Lurch.

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #17 on:** February 05, 2004, 01:57:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by muckmaw
Where was Clinton during Vietnam?

Dinger · « **Reply #18 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:10:11 PM »

OMG GWB isn't the only spoiled rich kid in Skull & Bones. I'm shocked!
And yeah, nothing like starting out an editorial with hearsay.

SirLoin · « **Reply #19 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:13:34 PM »

So far as I can read he never groped anyone..so what's your point?

Gunslinger · « **Reply #20 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:17:06 PM »

John Kerry is only a war vetran when it's convenient for him. He hung out with the same group in the 60's/70's that spat on US serviceman returning from veitnam and calling them baby killers/faciest. The fact that he is all gung ho about being a combat vet now makes him even more scum in my book. Not saying that he didnt do his time but when you hang out with flag burners afterwords you discredit your own uniform.

Frogm4n · « **Reply #21 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:22:40 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
John Kerry is only a war vetran when it's convenient for him. He hung out with the same group in the 60's/70's that spat on US serviceman returning from veitnam and calling them baby killers/faciest. The fact that he is all gung ho about being a combat vet now makes him even more scum in my book. Not saying that he didnt do his time but when you hang out with flag burners afterwords you discredit your own uniform.

do you even read gunslinger? He is a vet that helped protest and bring about the end of the war.

john9001 · « **Reply #22 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:27:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Frogm4n
do you even read gunslinger? He is a vet that helped protest and bring about the end of the war.

the protesters did not "end the war" they ended US support for south vietnam, then 2 years later north vietnam "ended the war"

Frogm4n · « **Reply #23 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:28:47 PM »

So you still believe we were doing the right thing by being there john?

lord dolf vader · « **Reply #24 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:29:31 PM »

puttin down a dude with multiple bronze stars and the silver star.

yea he is anti soldier. cept for the ones he risked his life to save under fire. above and beyond the call of duty. they teach you that logic in the corps? criticise his politics shure but you spouting fighting words with no evidence at all.

find a quote of him putting down veterans. cause i cant.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #25 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:32:40 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Frogm4n
do you even read gunslinger? He is a vet that helped protest and bring about the end of the war.

Yes guilty by association. Libs want to burn bush for his oil ties well I dont like kerry cause of his hippy ties!

He came home and because it was a convenient political stance became a war protester.

He hung out with the same people that:

burn the flag

throw their medals over the lawn of the white house (wich he said he only threw his ribbons....if your gonna do somthing mr sen. MEAN IT)

Called my fellow servicemen "baby killers" and "facists"

spit on GIs returning from the war

by all means he is a decorated vetran but to me it seems that only matters when it is convient. Librals blast bush for his service record but looked the other way for clinton. CONVEINENCE!!!

Frogm4n · « **Reply #26 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:35:30 PM »

He came home and was disgusted with what he saw over there. That is the reason why he did what he did. The man lost all his early elections because of his stance on the war.

And you know what, alot of your fellow GI's were spitting on their fellow GI's because they were babykillers and facists. History shows that we did alot of bad things while over there fighting to keep a people oppressed.

Frogm4n · « **Reply #27 on:** February 05, 2004, 02:36:40 PM »

and clinton never volunteered and then didnt show up. He used the other out at the time. school.
most people in politics managed to get out of service in vietnam.

Gunslinger · « **Reply #28 on:** February 05, 2004, 03:36:01 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Frogm4n
He came home and was disgusted with what he saw over there. That is the reason why he did what he did. The man lost all his early elections because of his stance on the war.

And you know what, alot of your fellow GI's were spitting on their fellow GI's because they were babykillers and facists. History shows that we did alot of bad things while over there fighting to keep a people oppressed.

You just proved my point. GIs spitting on other GIs for doing the same thing that they did. Not all GIs in nam were combat vets....not all GIs in nam put boot heels through baby's skulls to save bullets....in fact MOST GIs NEVER DID THESE THINGS

But war protesters marching to the comunist flag of the army that DID DO most of these things and calling their fellow citizens FACISTS!!!!!!!.....OH THE IRONY IT KILLS ME!

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #29 on:** February 05, 2004, 03:39:43 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Frogm4n
So you still believe we were doing the right thing by being there john?

You think PRVN should have been allowed to invade RVN unopposed?