Originally posted by fd ski
Funk and mietla, do you want to discuss the topic or just post one liners ?
Brevity is a soul of wit my friend.
As I said, I consider this system to be a completely absurd and totally unacceptable. There is no point in arguing it. You either believe in a principle of equality under law or you don't. Once you accept that "equality of pain" is a goal here, there is no stopping until you get absurd.
For example, if the punishment should be a funcion of income, why not rewards. This way a wealthy person should be paid much more than a poor person (for the same job).
What should your fine be if you are poor but your parents are wealthy?
Why should we tolerate unequal hardship while buying anything? Why should bread or butter cost the same for everybody?
You see? in addition to being fundamentally unfair, it gets ridiculous in a hurry. Just like any egalitarian utopian pie in a sky beyond "equal before the law".
I just can't believe you are serious. Troll away
Originally posted by fd ski
Whole thing is simply about punishment for breaking the law. I'm not talking about insurance or taxes, to get that out of your heads.
Let me give you different example:
Let's say I'm an average human, but you funk, in all your greatness have been genetically modified to have huge tongue and live 300 years. Let's say it's a known fact, right here and now that I have another 50 years left while you have 270 more to go.
Punishment for murder is 25 year ( for example ).
I wouldn't do it, for me it' s a half of my remaining time.
For you, on the other hand, not that much of a deal, is it ? Only 1/10th ?
Punishment is supposed to deter person from doing the same thing again, it's hardly a deterent if subjected person barely notices it. [/B]
You yourself just showed an absurdity of this thing.