« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: P-38j-25-lo  (Read 712 times)

Offline Dessy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
P-38j-25-lo
« on: February 13, 2004, 05:27:30 PM »
Please?

For those of us who would like to fly the near-perfect 38 model that actually saw quite a bit of combat in the ETO. There are a lot of neat J markings too (364th FG, etc.) that would be out of place on the L, though there isn't really much of a difference between the two...
Logged

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
P-38j-25-lo
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2004, 05:44:58 PM »
Personaly I would rather see a G, it would realy help in the SEA and the CT.
Logged

Offline Dessy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
P-38j-25-lo
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2004, 06:05:11 PM »
Well I can live just fine with any P-38 model, but if we want one of the early years then how about something really sexy...



I *think* that's one of the castrated would-be RAF 38s, but I don't know for certain.

Seriously though, the F or G would be good too, a nice addition for any earlier MTO/North Africa scenarios.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2004, 06:13:16 PM by Dessy »
Logged

Offline mos

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 219
P-38j-25-lo
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2004, 06:49:29 PM »
I also support the early-war P38, I would fly it both in the MA (alternating between the L and whatever old version was added), and in whatever scenarios wanted to include it.
Logged

Offline Cooley

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 891
P-38j-25-lo
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2004, 02:04:49 AM »
Yep,,,Always looked forward to that first weekend of the RPS in WB2.77 when the P-38F arrived


If they dont create a J,  will it be ok to use a Historical Skin from the J on our L? (367th flew J's)
they were similar

:D
« Last Edit: February 14, 2004, 02:11:27 AM by Cooley »
Logged
Cooleyof 367th

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
P-38j-25-lo
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2004, 03:03:35 AM »
No need for the P-38J-25-LO series since it's pretty much the same as the L model.  However, early model P-38J's would be a different matter and I would like to see one of those in the game.



ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Ecliptik

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 515
P-38j-25-lo
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2004, 11:43:02 AM »
Yeah, I'd like to see one of the sleeker early small-intake models.
Logged

Offline Dessy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
P-38j-25-lo
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2004, 03:56:14 PM »
Well as Cooley said, if we can use late-model J markings from the ETO on the L, then it doesn't matter.
Logged

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
P-38j-25-lo
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2004, 06:18:28 PM »
Id like the P47N...thank you for your attention :)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »