Originally posted by Manedew
Kosovo was NATO not UN ... do more research.... I'm sure NATO felt within it's rights.....
As did the US and British-led international coalition that removed Saddam. And yes, Manedew, the military campaign was
started by NATO (because the UN was mired in its usual parallysis), but who's running the show there now? That's one of my main points, that the UN is not only incapable of effective action, it it incapable of overseeing the reconstruction and democratization of troubled regions.
Regarding WMD, Saddam was in non-compliance, period. The world as a whole (including the duplicitous Mr. Kerry) believed Iraq failed to provide evidence that (a) they had fully destroyed existing stockpiles of WMD and (b) had given up efforts to acquire them. While weaponized WMD have not been found to prove (a), ample evidence has been uncovered that Iraq was actively concealing efforts to preserve the capability to make WMD, and to expand they types of weapons it could produce. It is also a safe bet that the UN inspections regime restarted in the months before the liberation of Iraq (inspections that would never have taken place but for the threat of action by the Coalition) was unlikely to be successful in any reasonable amount of time, given those active efforts to circumvent the inspections. The inspections would have dragged on and eventually been discontinued due to pressure by nations within the UN SC to normalize relations with Saddam's government. Such inspections are only effective if, in the case of South Africa, the nation being inspected truly wants to divest itself of such arms.