Author Topic: Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...  (Read 657 times)

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2004, 11:34:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Lizking
We tried to get UN help.  They would only crawfish on the resolutions they had already passed.

And it turns out they were right. Hmmmm.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2004, 11:40:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by rpm371
And it turns out they were right. Hmmmm.


Right about what?

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2004, 11:59:01 PM »
That Saddam was complying with the WMD removal. Don't get me wrong, Hussein is a bad,bad man that needed his prettythang kicked.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2004, 12:13:28 AM »
The UNSC in 1441 said he was in breach of previous resolutions, and says specifically:

Quote
Recognizing the threat Iraq’s non-compliance with Council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles poses to international peace and security,  


Saddam was not complying, as to comply he would have had to shown evidence of the destruction of WMDs to inspectors.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2004, 12:46:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holden McGroin
The UNSC in 1441 said he was in breach of previous resolutions, and says specifically:

 

Saddam was not complying, as to comply he would have had to shown evidence of the destruction of WMDs to inspectors.


wow.
so we invade countries now and kill thousands of people cause they cant prove a negative?
The UN has learned full strength now what appeasing aggression gets you.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2004, 01:45:15 AM »
Quote
excerpt from 1441
1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraq’s failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);

 


Its not proving a negative.... all Iraq had to do was act openly.  Iraq was not in compliance, and the UNSC said so 15 - 0

I was just taking issue with rpm371's statement that SH was in compliance when, by international decree he was not.

Ideas not directly related to the specific issue of compliance should not be inferred.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2004, 04:16:34 AM by Holden McGroin »
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2004, 06:23:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by rpm371
That Saddam was complying with the WMD removal. Don't get me wrong, Hussein is a bad,bad man that needed his prettythang kicked.


That isn't supported by Kay. If you want to believe the parts in the Kay report that say there aren't any WMD, you'd better be prepared to accept the rest, which says SH and Iraq sure acted as if there were.

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2004, 06:26:25 AM »
'Acting as if there were' is generally known as a bluff. I would have thought it would be sensible to expose that bluff rather than use it to further your geo-political agenda.
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #23 on: February 19, 2004, 06:30:32 AM »
That doesn't make much sense, Dowding. If the whole world thought the WMD existed, you can't blame Bush alone. In that respect Bush has been totally vindicated. Now the WMD were not found, and we need to find out what went wrong, but acting on the belief that was generally held by the world hardly seems unreasonable.

And you should be saying "Our" geopolitical agenda.

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #24 on: February 19, 2004, 06:39:34 AM »
It depends if you think the bluff was honestly believed by the respective governments, or whether there was embellishment etc. The 45 minute claim for instance, was based on a single source, was not qualified with any detailed information regarding type of weapon, and therefore scale of threat. It was mentioned in the same breath as 'mushroom clouds' and therefore it was rather convenient to let people make the obvious conclusion that Iraq could threaten British interests in the Gulf and Med. I've read the Dodgy Dossier and it seems to try and illustrate Iraq as a direct threat to British (and I suppose American) interests.

As for your/our, I was talking in general terms.
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #25 on: February 19, 2004, 06:52:41 AM »
I'm all for finding out if there was a lie. However you must confess Bush opponents are already saying it WAS a lie, and much of the debate here is founded on that supposition. I don't think that is proven yet. Smart? No, but he's never been seen as "smart". Dishonest? That's another matter altogether.

Offline _Schadenfreude_

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #26 on: February 19, 2004, 06:59:11 AM »
It's actually a pretty good idea and one I think that the current administration will take over as their own - "Look we overturned the Tyrant, we made Iraq Democratic, we've captured Saddam and made sure he won't threaten the world with WMD's since we've proved he doesn't have any.....now we're going to mend fences with our Allies and hand over the the Administration to the UN!!" - then we don't have to lose any more troops, or spend any more money that that god awful mess that we've created!

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #27 on: February 19, 2004, 07:04:01 AM »
"Our".

Offline Gh0stFT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1736
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #28 on: February 19, 2004, 07:28:50 AM »
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN

NO ! thank you.
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
Kerry says we should turn over Iraq to UN...
« Reply #29 on: February 19, 2004, 07:50:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Manedew
Kosovo was NATO not UN ...  do more research....  I'm sure NATO felt within it's rights.....


As did the US and British-led international coalition that removed Saddam.  And yes, Manedew, the military campaign was started by NATO (because the UN was mired in its usual parallysis), but who's running the show there now?  That's one of my main points, that the UN is not only incapable of effective action, it it incapable of overseeing the reconstruction and democratization of troubled regions.

Regarding WMD, Saddam was in non-compliance, period.  The world as a whole (including the duplicitous Mr. Kerry) believed Iraq failed to provide evidence that (a) they had fully destroyed existing stockpiles of WMD and (b) had given up efforts to acquire them.  While weaponized WMD have not been found to prove (a), ample evidence has been uncovered that Iraq was actively concealing efforts to preserve the capability to make WMD, and to expand they types of weapons it could produce.  It is also a safe bet that the UN inspections regime restarted in the months before the liberation of Iraq (inspections that would never have taken place but for the threat of action by the Coalition) was unlikely to be successful in any reasonable amount of time, given those active efforts to circumvent the inspections.  The inspections would have dragged on and eventually been discontinued due to pressure by nations within the UN SC to normalize relations with Saddam's government.  Such inspections are only effective if, in the case of South Africa, the nation being inspected truly wants to divest itself of such arms.
Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."