Author Topic: For the Star Wars Geeks  (Read 488 times)

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
For the Star Wars Geeks
« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2004, 10:57:06 AM »
Furious
 The names may not have been any better, but they had charecter, unlike the wooden uninteresting ones in the new movies.

Offline TheDudeDVant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2429
For the Star Wars Geeks
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2004, 10:58:15 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furious
Was it ever any better?

Luke Skywalker
Leia Organa
Han Solo


Maybe the names were just newer and represented more excitment at one time..

dude

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
For the Star Wars Geeks
« Reply #17 on: March 31, 2004, 11:12:18 AM »
nerds.

Wheres that video of the little dog taking the piss outta star war geeks at when ya need it...
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
For the Star Wars Geeks
« Reply #18 on: March 31, 2004, 11:18:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GtoRA2
This really does make me angry though. I truely do feel the new movies have taken allot away from the 3 that were good.


Yep.  Either that or my cinematic tastes have matured.  Or a combination of both.

Personally, if I were George, I wouldn't have sat on my hands so long.  I either would've made the next films "in cycle" (about 3 or 4 years apart, but no more) or not made them at all.  By waiting so long, he tried to introduce new characters to a new audience while alienating his old audience.  He would've been better off doing a completely new serial oriented to the kids and keeping the "Star Wars" tale in tune with an older audience.  For example, in Episode IV, Carrie Fisher provided a good dose of cheesecake in most of her scenes (such as in the scene where just before her home planet gets blasted, its quite obvious she's strutting around bra-less).  And in Episode VI we get the Slave Leia scenes which fueled the sex fantasies for most American males between the ages of 10 and 40 for the next 20 years.  But in Eps 1 and 2, George oriented it to the kids, and hence no bloody arms on the floor of a cantina, no half-naked Princesses, no green-skinned women dancers cavorting in the evil guys' lair.

If SW: Ep3 is released in the same summer as the new Batman film, I'll probably spend my cash on Batman.

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
For the Star Wars Geeks
« Reply #19 on: March 31, 2004, 11:20:58 AM »
they make the new star wars movies, but they cancel farscape. sad sad sad.

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
For the Star Wars Geeks
« Reply #20 on: March 31, 2004, 11:23:07 AM »
Gofaster!
 Right on target.

 Sadly, asking the kids he aimed the new movies at what they thought of them? None care? lol My girlfriends kids want Ugio and pokamon stuff, they got some starwars toys for xmas and STILL have not opened them.


LOL if lucas had aimed the movies at his real fan base the toys would have still sold, just not to kids! :D

Offline CyranoAH

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2304
For the Star Wars Geeks
« Reply #21 on: March 31, 2004, 11:38:49 AM »
Anyone still got the link to the triumph vs. Star Wars nerds video?

Daniel

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
For the Star Wars Geeks
« Reply #22 on: March 31, 2004, 11:59:52 AM »
They are hard to find now. I can't find them and I just looked. Whatever network owned the rights started warning pages that hosted the videos.

:(

Some funny stuff, I am glad I saved the files.... I think.