Author Topic: How to argue like a liberal (Read 438 times)

AKIron · « **Reply #15 on:** March 31, 2004, 11:56:21 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
Can either of these statements be backed up with something creditable?

Iraqi ties to AlQ?? Can you back that up with anything? Have you ever seen a shread of evidence supporting this?

How about this?

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/30/sprj.irq.alqaeda.weapons/

Frogm4n · « **Reply #16 on:** March 31, 2004, 11:58:42 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
How about this?

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/30/sprj.irq.alqaeda.weapons/

Yes we know. After saddam left al queada was able to come into iraq with no problems.

The white house even said that their is no connection to saddam and al queada.

Connection · « **Reply #17 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:00:40 PM »

Ripsnort, I think that it is interchangeable with "conservative":

Example 1
Example 2

...but funny nontheless

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #18 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:02:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
How about this?

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/30/sprj.irq.alqaeda.weapons/

So thin it can hardly be seen.... A few 'documents' found is evidence AQ was operating in Iraqi pre-invasion? This proves fact?

How about the fact of WMD buried? If they found a hole in the desert would that prove fact as well??

dude

Frogm4n · « **Reply #19 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:04:40 PM »

Faith man faith. God eerrrr Bush is not wrong. have faith in him.

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #20 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:21:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Frogm4n
Faith man faith. God eerrrr Bush is not wrong. have faith in him.

lol

BUSH IS JESUS our saviour!! Damn my clouded mind.. Thanks for reminding me..

dude

Saurdaukar · « **Reply #21 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:24:19 PM »

Not a bad find, but I disagree. The author is missing a key ingrediant: keywords designed to trap the Conservative.

They include, but and not limited to the following: Sexist, racist, bigot, Nazi, Facist, homophobe, and Bush Drone.

Any opinion in direct conflict with that of the Liberal will warrent one of the preceeding labels to be assigned to the Conservative. At the same time, the Liberal's secondary aim is to question the validity of the Conservative's position and to confuse him into thinking that he is stupid for having said opinion.

Example:

C - "I dont agree with homosexuality."
L - "LOL! Then youre obviously a homophobe!"
C - "How does that work?"
L - "Youre afraid of gays."
C - "Where did I say that?"
L - "LOL hypocrite homophobe."
C - "I dont agree with their lifestyle... Im not afriad of them."
L - "Do you even know the clinical definition of honophobia maximus, caveman?"
C - "What?"
L - "HAHAH!! Youre stupid!"
C - "Enlighten me."
L - "HAHAH!! Youre a Nazi homo hater! Hey guys - this guy doesnt even know the clinical definition of Homophobia Maximus!"
C - "Who are you talking to? What is the definition?"
L - "HAHAH!! Youre dumb! Homophobia Maximus: Any conservative that disagrees with you about heterosexually challenged marraige."
C - "Um... source?"
L - "HAHA!! Stupid caveman, I got it from http://www.ihatebush.com "

And so on...

Dirty people, they are. Kinda like lawyers, but without the tact or brain power.

10Bears · « **Reply #22 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:47:47 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
FACT: They had 'em and may still have 'em buried in the desert.

No ties to Al Queada? Do you really believe that?

LOL!!!! Classic... Exactly Iron.. LOL!!

Ok how do you write this internet thing?.... PN8OND!!!

Faith based evidance?...

Connection · « **Reply #23 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:49:53 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
FACT: They had 'em and may still have 'em buried in the desert.

No ties to Al Queada? Do you really believe that?

Quote

fact ( P ) Pronunciation Key (fkt)
n.

1. Knowledge or information based on real occurrences: an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy.
2.
1. Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed: Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact.
2. A real occurrence; an event: had to prove the facts of the case.
3. Something believed to be true or real: a document laced with mistaken facts.
3. A thing that has been done, especially a crime: an accessory before the fact.
4. Law. The aspect of a case at law comprising events determined by evidence: The jury made a finding of fact.

Saurdaukar · « **Reply #24 on:** March 31, 2004, 12:53:58 PM »

Following the "Liberal Argument" timetable to a 'T'. In one post, you have attempted to hit two birds with one stone - indirectly calling the previous poster stupid and forcing him to question his own standpoint and use of the word "Fact."

Brilliant! Keep it up!