Author Topic: About Hartmann's G-6  (Read 1030 times)

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2004, 02:40:58 AM »
Update:




 Details for the fuselage are now finished.
 Appropriate camo patterns for the wings are applied.
 Most of the jagged lines are taken care of.
 Mottling pattern more defined
 
 The wing panel lines still needs some working to do, as it's currently a G-10 panel line.. but it'll be finished soon.

Offline Batz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3470
      • http://bellsouthpwp.net/w/o/wotans/4JG53/
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2004, 06:36:15 AM »
Wow, It looks great!!!!

Offline Batz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3470
      • http://bellsouthpwp.net/w/o/wotans/4JG53/
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #17 on: March 31, 2004, 06:38:33 AM »
One thing though, the camo pattern on the right wing should be more square in the middle. Check the pic I posted above.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #18 on: March 31, 2004, 09:11:15 AM »
Is it possible to eliminate the dupilcate ammo loading doors on the top of the right wing? They were only on the left side to feed the engine cannon ammo box which was in the left wing.

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #19 on: April 06, 2004, 04:20:23 AM »
Update:

 Everything is finished now, except the weathering and smudging.

 



 A couple of questions:

1. Grunherz et all; look at the 3rd pic please. Which of the two am I supposed to remove?? (A) or (B)??


2. The text under the cowl part is derived from the G-10. It looks good, but I have no idea if this text was present for the G-6, too. Looking at some text sheets for the other Bf109s, I'm pretty sure something was written at that particular area. Any input on this would be greatly appreciated.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #20 on: April 06, 2004, 04:57:17 AM »
1)  A and B both need to be removed from the right wing.

2) The text is accurate.

Offline Batz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3470
      • http://bellsouthpwp.net/w/o/wotans/4JG53/
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #21 on: April 07, 2004, 06:19:06 AM »
Quote
2. The text under the cowl part is derived from the G-10. It looks good, but I have no idea if this text was present for the G-6


Gruen is correct look at the pic of the model you posted...


Offline Replicant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #22 on: April 07, 2004, 06:57:10 AM »
The pic below is of a 109-G2 which also has the same text, so I would assume that it's correct on the G6 too?
NEXX

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #23 on: April 07, 2004, 10:50:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kweassa
Update:

 Everything is finished now, except the weathering and smudging.

 
That looks absolutely great.  Don't weather it or mess it up.  Let the poor 109 pilot have a brand new 109 instead of one that looks like it's been through the ringer :)

Dan/Slack
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Replicant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #24 on: April 07, 2004, 10:57:01 AM »
Also, is the text below standard on 109s?  What exactly is it referring to?  Attention, Max Gross weight or something?
NEXX

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
About Hartmann's G-6
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2004, 05:59:56 AM »
The wing marking indicate tire size.

The fuselage marking near the oil cooler basically says: be careful when openning, the oil coooler is built into the cowl.  

The lower cowl contains the whole oil cooler assembly and the cowl swings opeb, down and to the right (right, looking from cockpit, or away from the sticker).