Author Topic: Where did you fly on Fester's OZK map? - poll (Read 1780 times)

mars01 · « **Reply #60 on:** April 17, 2004, 06:39:48 PM »

Quote

It cracks me up the way you pay lip service to finger in the air hypotheses as provided by Delirium which, on his own admission, was not scientific, but you pooh-pooh real facts supported by photographic evidence. I guess it's a case of believing what you want to believe.

Beetle its a total joke that you think cause you posted a few picks and created the context, without the film to back it up, that you have any facts.

So when are you going to answer my questions, instead of skirt them beet?

Quote

why do 90% of the fields have to be a sector or more apart on this map? Why cant there be an even 50/50 with half the fileds a sector or more apart and half the fileds less than a sector apart? Why are you against this?

Sorry these questions are so inflammatory.

mars01 · « **Reply #61 on:** April 17, 2004, 06:53:51 PM »

Quote

When do you most of you really discuss anything intellectually without involving the style of ones flying ability, the plane he flies, or even how many kills he can land? Now thats rare.

I guess that is a pretty subjective question. No offense, but like I said no one is forcing you to read the posts or participate. If it bothers you that much why do you bother really?

WldThing · « **Reply #62 on:** April 17, 2004, 07:00:30 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by mars01
I guess that is a pretty subjective question. No offense, but like I said no one is forcing you to read the posts or participate. If it bothers you that much why do you bother really?

Quote

Huh,

Did I miss something. Is this a private thread. Where did I miss that. Hmmmm a discussion board where we aren’t aloud to make comments and have a discussion. Interesting concept. .

Easy answer Eh?

BTW think i should have posted this in the other flaming thread, this one is weak.

mars01 · « **Reply #63 on:** April 17, 2004, 07:13:59 PM »

I'm not sure what you are trying to start wldthg, I am not saying you shouldn't post in here. I am only asking, since your posts smack with such discontempt, and the conversations are so weak as you put it, why do you bother?

Yeah this one has been a bit mild comparativly lol.

Jackal1 · « **Reply #64 on:** April 18, 2004, 05:51:00 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by mars01
discontempt

Gotta love it!

lazs2 · « **Reply #65 on:** April 18, 2004, 10:32:25 AM »

ah.. beettle ... so you admit that you threw out data that didn't support what you wanted.

2/3 would be half for 2 half for three.

lazs

beet1e · « **Reply #66 on:** April 18, 2004, 10:56:57 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
ah.. beettle ... so you admit that you threw out data that didn't support what you wanted.

2/3 would be half for 2 half for three.

No Lazs. The answer I asked for was a numeric integer between 1 and 5. 2/3 and 3.5 are not integers. I asked the respondents to give the closest value to what they did, not try to give an exact value involving decimal places. 26 people understood perfectly and gave valid responses before I closed the poll and posted the results. I only had to discount about 3 spurious votes. But if 2/3 means 2.5, then that vote was balanced by the 3.5 vote that I also discounted as these two votes deviated from the medium (3) by 0.5 each. So the end result would have been almost identical. I say "almost" because two people gave 2/3 as an answer.

In any poll, there are spoilt ballot papers.

sourkraut · « **Reply #67 on:** April 18, 2004, 03:08:02 PM »

Don't see much difference between 1 and 2. I see 2 as saying - you furballed a good portion of the time and on occasion left the furball area. There could be a reason to leave the furball area. The one that applied to me was that the nits no longer owned any turf in the region.

Sour