Author Topic: Chicken Hawks  (Read 1919 times)

Offline stratman

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
      • http://lawsquadron.com
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #45 on: April 29, 2004, 11:42:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
With Iraq, that might have been the smarter move. :aok


Well I tend to agree with ya there.
I still want that Osama guy!

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #46 on: April 29, 2004, 11:45:50 PM »
Er Grun, maybe just maybe Kerry can situate two different concepts in his mind at the very same time. Imagine that.

Money to give the troops the things they need, whilst not wreaking havoc on the economy at the same time.

The only way I give you kudos for your stance is if you used your tax rebate to buy a fishing rod. I'm totally into that now and would understand.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #47 on: April 29, 2004, 11:49:47 PM »
Kerry authorized for the troops to go to war. Then when they were at war he voted against supportting them.

Nash:

He obviously chose in favor of his high tax policies and against the troops.

He voted for authorization to send trooops into battle then voted against supporting them.

Kerry is the Chickenhawk.

Offline _Schadenfreude_

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #48 on: April 29, 2004, 11:50:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lasersailor184
Wow schaden, that was almost funny...  Almost...


Maybe next time they could think of something funny and original.


I don't know - pretty damn good catch from one post if you ask me...

Offline _Schadenfreude_

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #49 on: April 29, 2004, 11:53:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bodhi
I served... how about you?


Yep - 61 Mech, infantry, 1980 to 1984, wounded once fell off a helicopter once, have a knee that can tell when it's going to rain.

Google 61 Mech if you're interested.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #50 on: April 29, 2004, 11:53:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
Er Grun, maybe just maybe Kerry can situate two different concepts in his mind at the very same time. Imagine that.

Money to give the troops the things they need, whilst not wreaking havoc on the economy at the same time.

The only way I give you kudos for your stance is if you used your tax rebate to buy a fishing rod. I'm totally into that now and would understand.


Nash , the money for the military has nothing to do with tax cuts....

Kerry blamed Bush for not funding the troops, yet he is the one that voted to not fund them.

The Money was availible to the troops, Kerry voted against using it for them, then Blamed Bush for not funding it. The tax cuts are not related to the 87 billion for the troops. The tax cuts actually have re-booted our economy.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #51 on: April 30, 2004, 12:00:45 AM »
Okay - lets get this out of the way right now. You - Grun - calling Kerry a "Chicken Hawk" is one of the most incredibly bewildering things I've ever seen in my whole entire life ever.

That's not even comparing him to you.

Good luck with that.

He didn't vote against supporting them.

He voted on the *way* to support them.

Obviously you didn't want to give up your new Nordick Track or excercise bike, Bush felt your pain, and now we have troops in Iraq without body armour (btw I'm just taking your word for that).

"Kerry is the ChickenHawk". If it weren't inhuman and impossible, I'd advocate stapling you to the back of Kerry while he was defending your preciouis freedoms. You don't even have the right to spit that BS on the ground he walks....

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #52 on: April 30, 2004, 12:05:08 AM »
The troops have body armor as good as or  better than probably any in the world... they don't have the latest and most modern American armor perhapse....but that has nothing to do with Bush.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #53 on: April 30, 2004, 12:07:31 AM »
Eh? Well what is it that they lack?

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #54 on: April 30, 2004, 12:14:30 AM »
My problem with Kerry: He voted to authorize Bush to attack Iraq, then tried to say he didn't.

He voted against 87 billion to fund equipment for the troops, then said Bush refused to fund them.

He said Bush mis-led us on Iraq's wmd, yet he stated that Iraq had wmd and was a threat.

He says he's an evironmentalist, yet maintains 5 mansions, private jet, man-servant, power yatch and god knows what else

He says he threw "8-9, more " medals away then shows a reporter those medals in his home.

I would rather die than be such a hypocrite....

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #55 on: April 30, 2004, 12:15:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
Eh? Well what is it that they lack?


The latest American body armor?

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #56 on: April 30, 2004, 12:16:24 AM »
Maybe I dunno... Lets get this 1st thing out of the way 1st.

What do the troops in Iraq not have right now due to Kerry's voting?

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #57 on: April 30, 2004, 12:17:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
Maybe I dunno... Lets get this 1st thing out of the way 1st.

What do the troops in Iraq not have right now due to Kerry's voting?


nothing.

yet Kerry blames Bush for it.

acually , Kerry was in the senate far more years than Bush has been Pez.......Kerry has voted against almost all military funding.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2004, 12:19:44 AM by NUKE »

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #58 on: April 30, 2004, 12:19:03 AM »
Oh stupid me I thought it was the other way around.

So you're saying that Kerry blames Bush for the troops having everything they need.

Man, I should stay out of political threads... they are way too complex.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Chicken Hawks
« Reply #59 on: April 30, 2004, 12:23:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
Oh stupid me I thought it was the other way around.

So you're saying that Kerry blames Bush for the troops having everything they need.

Man, I should stay out of political threads... they are way too complex.


Nash, you asked me "What do the troops in Iraq not have right now due to Kerry's voting"


And I answered "nothing"

When did I say Kerry blamed Bush for having everything they need?