Originally posted by strk
fact - Sharon only recently relented on the settlement issue - just this week iirc. His conservative hard line approach was to increase the settlements.
Actual fact: his policy was to pull out of Gaza and dig in in the west bank, until he lost a Likud party policy vote. When he lost the support of Likud, he modified the policy.
fact - Bush made a diplomatic mistake by siding with Sharon. The US needs to broker a peace, and not take sides - especially since we finance Israel. Actually I guess it was more of an opinion.[/B]
I think Bush was trying to support a compromise, getting Isreal out of Gaza would at least get a piece of the future Palestinian state in Palestinian hands. The other side of the coin, the west bank, was too much to pay for it, and made the compromise a bad idea.
The US policy should be for total Israeli withdrawl from the West Bank and Gaza as soon as the Palestinians denounce terror, disband hamas, hezbolla et al, arrest the leaders, get rid of Arafat, and hold elections for new leadership. Start acting like a country instead of a mob of thugs.
The ME mess is basicaly at its heart a class and racial/cultural struggle. [/B]
I think the Arabs really wouldn't care much about Palestine if it weren't for the state controlled press of the region flaming it up all the time. They flame it to keep their population from being angry about their plight in their own countries. It's a misdirection ploy by the various governments of the region to stay in power and keep raking in the benifits of power.