Originally posted by 2stony
So, which one takes precedent? If you're going to ban swastikas, are you going to ban the Japanese meatball? They committed atrocities too(if that's your reasoning). Are you going to ban the British roundel because of the bombing of Dresden? Are you going to ban the U.S. national insignia because of the fire bombing of Tokyo? Are "Western" video games going to ban any U.S. calvary banners because of Wounded Knee?
I'll do my best to answer your questions in order before locking this thread. If you have a further interest in this subject, I suggest doing a search. You'll find numerous and long threads going back to the beginning of this board. Every argument for and against has been repeated ad nauseum.
To answer your questions-
1- They are not mutually exclusive requirements. It states we would only use skins that were historically used, not that we would only use skins that are 100% historically accurate to every detail. I.E., Marseille's Yellow 14 without a swastika is alright, Malibu Barbie Spitfire is not. It shouldn't be that confusing.
2- No
3- No
4- No (P.S., German insignia aren't removed either in case you didn't notice)
5- We have no plans to develop that kind of game.