Author Topic: Question for Pyro  (Read 920 times)

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Question for Pyro
« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2004, 10:01:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by WHATTHEHELL
AS I can say I only can hope for the 410.  It is the one plane I would love to have and I have not flown it since EAW!!!!


What? I never got to fly the 410 in EAW.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Pyro

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4020
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: Question for Pyro
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2004, 11:05:31 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by WHATTHEHELL
I know in years past you have said that you hated the Me-410.  


Huh?

Offline flakbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 867
      • http://www.worldaccessnet.com/~delta6
Question for Pyro
« Reply #17 on: May 20, 2004, 12:23:55 PM »
To correct a few people...

Pyro hasn't ever said he hated the Me-410. Matter of fact, he's said on several occasions he'd love to add one. Especially the nightfighter variant if they could ever figure out how to pull off the technological improvements over time of aircraft-based radar. He has said he'd rather not add some variants because so many of a given aircraft already exist. The logic being that we've got a lot variants, and it'd be a snap to add a few more, but what would be the point? You'd end up with several sub-variants of one aircraft type and no new aircraft types. A few sub-types of one aircraft don't really add anything to the game, while new airframes do.

I'm still waiting on an A-26B/C along with the 410.


-----------------------
Flakbait [Delta6]
Delta Six's Flight School
Put the P-61B in Aces High

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
Question for Pyro
« Reply #18 on: May 20, 2004, 12:45:18 PM »
nah, they only hate the p-38.

years and years and them dive flaps and autoretract flaps not fixed.

:P

Offline WHATTHEHELL

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 209
Question for Pyro
« Reply #19 on: May 20, 2004, 02:20:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
What? I never got to fly the 410 in EAW.


With all the mods people started doign afterwards all planes that were AI became flyable.

Offline WHATTHEHELL

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 209
Re: Re: Question for Pyro
« Reply #20 on: May 20, 2004, 02:22:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pyro
Huh?


Like I said I may be wrong.  Might have gotten it confused with something else on one of those fire water drinkin nights.  My bad.

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Question for Pyro
« Reply #21 on: May 21, 2004, 07:26:01 AM »
Seems to me that AH2 is the carrier for ToD...........

For ToD to work as a total concept then new ride development would have to focus on getting a complete theatre set up...........

This would mean  choosing the theatre and time period they wanted to do 1st and plugging any gaps in the ride choices available..............

eg if we were to look at Western Europe Summer 44 we miss

Day time

B24variants
Spit variants
P38 variants
109  variants
Mossie variants

not to mention various LW bombers.

V1 drones?

Night time

Halifax
Mossie night fighter
110 night fighter
Ju88 night fighter

same not mentioned LW bombers

Spot lights?

I am sure you guys can add to the list better than I
Ludere Vincere

Offline mipoikel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3521
      • http://www.llv32.org
Question for Pyro
« Reply #22 on: May 21, 2004, 08:00:21 AM »
410 would be nice but...




















.... BRING BREWSTER TO AH!!!:D
I am a spy!

Offline Blammo

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 780
Question for Pyro
« Reply #23 on: May 21, 2004, 11:50:44 AM »
B-25
P-39
P-61
MiG-3


for starters...
BLAMM0 - FACTA, NON VERBA!