Iraqi sovereignty and the right to veto military operations.

[lada]

im glad you wait, coz here is around 11 am, so we are pretending some socialistic work

[NUKE]

Originally posted by lada
US did nothing, sure US army is holy cow


we will not count year and half of total chaos
ban of free trade, forcing them to buy crappy technology
killing hundreds of civilist
fatal inability  to supply public gas station with fuel, in  december it took aproximatly 2 days of waiting at Gas station to get gas.
we rather not speak about export
US cooperate with former Bassis guys, many of them are back in their chairs, viva liberalization



actualy what are US doing in Iraq now ? seeking terrorist, hunting evil ditator, seeking WMD or what ?

ahhh.... yeah i forget, that you secure Iraq.... yeah Army whitch provoke uprising is securing.....

Red army used absolutly same rhetoric these days


Stop dreaming and go ask Iraqi to the iraq.

I guess you will be very lucky if you will make home alive.
I were lucky to meet some over here.
I wish you to listen them personaly.


actualy tell me, when US army did something what were consider to be honorable in past 30 years ?

So Saddam was better for Iraqis than Iraqi's........ I get it. You feel that Saddam was a better option for ruling Iraq  than Iraqis ....

[lada]

Originally posted by NUKE
So Saddam was better for Iraqis than Iraqi's........ I get it. You feel that Saddam was a better option for ruling Iraq  than Iraqis ....

Where exactly did i speak about it ?

[Gixer]

Think the June 30th is more Political Goal then anything else. Doubt anything will change on the ground.




...-Gixer

[lada]

Originally posted by NUKE
So Saddam was better for Iraqis than Iraqi's........ I get it. You feel that Saddam was a better option for ruling Iraq  than Iraqis ....

Its more like Occupation is not that diferent compare to SH regime.

[Gyro/T69]

...because the war in Iraq is exactly like WW2.

You may have that forest, tree thing going here. I invite you to expand your thinking a bit further out of the box.

[Thrawn]

Originally posted by Gyro/T69
You may have that forest, tree thing going here. I invite you to expand your thinking a bit further out of the box.

If by thinking outside of the box, you mean thinking apples are oranges, I just don't see the point.

[Gyro/T69]

If by thinking outside of the box, you mean thinking apples are oranges, I just don't see the point.

Not if casualties are going to use as a litmus test to illustrate the success or failure of an on going operation. There were 6,000 casualties during the six-month operation on Guadalcanal. During that operation, one could argue the myopic view, that the men were being wasted at the rate of a 1000 a month, just to provide freedom for the jungle from the Japanese. At that point in time, that perception would hold water. Looking back with a bit of insight in 1945, the same observation would be dismissed out of hand.

Sorry for the tardy reply. My power supply went south today.

[Sandman]

Originally posted by Gyro/T69
Could you have claimed on 23 November 1943, that 3,133 KIA and 2,186 wounded Marines were “so worth it” after three days of battle?

The Democratic Nation of Tarawa was worth it.