Author Topic: WWII Memorial (Read 736 times)

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #15 on:** June 11, 2004, 10:46:40 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
With all due respect, all was "well" on September 10th, 2001...

So your words are incorrect. However, do remember, it's easy enough to fill a ditch when the time comes...

perhaps all was 'well' with you..... obviously not with others..

Shuckins · « **Reply #16 on:** June 11, 2004, 10:48:17 AM »

Who'd be crying the loudest if it was blow up and hundreds of people killed?

storch · « **Reply #17 on:** June 11, 2004, 10:54:42 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Classic fascist response to calls for liberty. You go Storch!

The problem stems from a fundamental flaw in liberal thinking, you liberals tend to confuse liberty with libertinism. My liberties haven't been affected in any noticable form. While I do harbor reservations with the "Patriot Act" I believe that safeguarding our structures and institutions is prudent. And as Grun stated in the unlikely event that terrorism is greatly reduced the moat will be easy enough to refill and resod.

midnight Target · « **Reply #18 on:** June 11, 2004, 11:14:38 AM »

OK, I admit the fascist line was a little over the top, but I get so sick and tired of the labelous (not libelous) BS in here. This Country needs Liberals as much as it needs Conservatives... maybe more. Sure liberalism is sometimes overzealous in its application. Sure liberalism chooses the least common denominator to provide its points at times. The reason is, that if we don't who will? I think of Libs as the Jiminy Cricket of the political spectrum. You know we're right. You just don't think we're necessary.

storch · « **Reply #19 on:** June 11, 2004, 11:16:34 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
OK, I admit the fascist line was a little over the top, but I get so sick and tired of the labelous (not libelous) BS in here. This Country needs Liberals as much as it needs Conservatives... maybe more. Sure liberalism is sometimes overzealous in its application. Sure liberalism chooses the least common denominator to provide its points at times. The reason is, that if we don't who will? I think of Libs as the Jiminy Cricket of the political spectrum. You know we're right. You just don't think we're necessary.

Oh no, the balance argument!

midnight Target · « **Reply #20 on:** June 11, 2004, 11:17:30 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by storch
Oh no, the balance argument!

Oh no... another label. Thanks for making my point.