It's interesting that it's a reduction of long term deployments. But I guess it's doesn't make sense to reduce short term deployments as the troops are still needed.
My concern is that one might be lead to believe that the current administration is, on the whole, for reducing deployments in general.
And the numbers don't seem to back up that point-of-view.
Currently there are about 250,000 deployed active US military personel out of some 500,000 on active duty (I don't know how many of those are deployable).
More info here.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/global-deployments.htmIn regards to the 12,700 US soldiers that are being reployed from South Korea, the South Korean foreign minister said that 4,000 are being redeployed to Iraq.
http://asia.news.yahoo.com/040517/afp/040517071643asiapacificnews.htmlBut he could be full of ****.
In regards to the German redeployment, I would like to know exactly what "fewer" means. That story seems to be still developing.
For what it's worth, I certainly would like to see the US save treasure from these deployments and be able to spend some more funding to intelligence services and boarder security. As I believe that the first responsibility of a government is to protect the freedoms of it's citizens.