Author Topic: Calling all Build Your Own Geeks  (Read 319 times)

Offline Max

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7725
Calling all Build Your Own Geeks
« on: June 16, 2004, 08:13:05 PM »
Given the advent of AH2 I added a Radeon 9800 Pro 128 meg card to my old Dell Dimension 8200 which was configured with:
P4 1.8 Mhz chipset
512 RDRAM
250 watt power supply
40 G HD

In  order to accommodate the Radeon vid card I upgraded the power supply to 380 watts, and added a 2nd HD. Given the $400 I've plowed back into an old Dell, I'm tempted to refit the new componants into a new case and upgrade the CPU/MB...on a budget of $500. I've learned thus far that the MB I get depends on the CPU...and the CPU will either be a P4 2.8 Mgz Intel or an Athlon XP2800. I'm told that by going with the Intel chipset, I'll pay a bit more for it and the compatable MB as well.

Any thoughts as per Athlon vs Pentium chips in the under $250 bracket? Would also appreciate MB recommendations for the CPU of choice.

Thanks~

DmdMax

Offline LSJ

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Calling all Build Your Own Geeks
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2004, 02:56:39 AM »
On a budget you really only have celeron and athlon to choose from, and the Athlon chips in my opinion are much better. As far as motherboards go Asus and Gigabyte would be my picks with a nforce chipset.

LSJ

Offline Octavius

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6651
Calling all Build Your Own Geeks
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2004, 03:45:38 AM »
Athlon 64 3000+ = $223

Athlon 64 3200+ = $270

MSI K8T Neo = $118

newegg :)
octavius
Fat Drunk BasTards (forum)

"bastard coated bastards with bastard filling?  delicious!"
Guest of the ++Blue Knights++[/size]

Offline snapperhead

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 216
Calling all Build Your Own Geeks
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2004, 10:25:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Octavius
Athlon 64 3000+ = $223

Athlon 64 3200+ = $270

MSI K8T Neo = $118

newegg :)


I dunno.......if it were me I would rather drop $120 on an XP2500 and a good nforce2 mobo. No compatibility issues, its cheap. Your gonna need some new memory as well, that stuff they put in Dell's is painfully slow. (RAMBUS)  .  AMD has yet to determine which socket will be their upgrade path socket 939 vs vs 754..........754 wil probably be phased out shortly leaving you with little to no upgrade path.

Offline BigGun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Calling all Build Your Own Geeks
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2004, 10:43:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by snapperhead
they put in Dell's is painfully slow. (RAMBUS)  


I thought Rambus - rdram- was actually faster ram. But then again I am not a tech guy & could be wrong.

Offline snapperhead

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 216
Calling all Build Your Own Geeks
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2004, 11:01:55 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by BigGun
I thought Rambus - rdram- was actually faster ram. But then again I am not a tech guy & could be wrong.


 It’s available in three different speeds—600 MHz, 700 MHz, and the fastest and costliest version at 800 MHz. It may seem like 800 MHz RDRAM would be six times faster than 133 MHz SDRAM, but this is not true, since the true measure of the capabilities of RAM is not just its frequency, but also factors like bandwidth, latency, etc.


The number of "lanes" differs between different memories. SDRAM has a 64-bit bus width. This means that at 133 MHz, its bandwidth stands at 1.064 GB/sec (64x133/8). In contrast, RDRAM has a 16-bit bus width but runs at 800 MHz giving it a theoretical bandwidth of 1.6 GB/sec (16x800/8). Thus, these figures show that RDRAM will not work all that fast compared to SDRAM.

Offline buzkill

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 686
Calling all Build Your Own Geeks
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2004, 11:12:17 AM »
look in "newegg.com" i got all my parts from there(not my ram) and it cost $675 total for xp2400 cpu; 40gig hd; asus a7v8x-mx mobo; radeon 9200(weak i know); and raidmax gaming tower with 350w power. $54 for a case was hard to pass up
so far it's been more stable than any other machine i've worked with; maybe not the fastest, but never crashes. after using windows ME for 4 years that made it all worth it:rolleyes: :D
« Last Edit: June 18, 2004, 11:15:26 AM by buzkill »

Offline BigGun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Calling all Build Your Own Geeks
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2004, 11:40:01 AM »
Thanks for the education...comp i have has 800mhz rdram...