Originally posted by Samiam
How does Clear Channel dropping Stern based on philosophical differences and market conditions have anything to do with the FCC?
I'm not saying that the FCC has acted fairly or rationally with respect to the fines it has levied against Stern, but if market forces made it worthwhile, Stern wouldn't have been yanked.
Clear Channel's decission to pull Howard Stern - however misguided it may be - is simply a corporate entity excercising its will in a free market. There's nothing untoward about that and it certainly can't be called censorship.
Good points but the issue is not so clear cut.
Clear channel had a number of on air personalitys that were being investigated by the FCC. Many are still on the air. The FCC fine addressed all the issues outstanding with Clear Channel (not just Howard Stern) although Clear Channel and the press are painting it like the fine was a result of Howard Stern only.
Stern was huge in the 6 markets they dropped him from. Clear Channel justified dropping him by saying it was due to indecency but it was only after he came out against GWB that they dropped him.
Even though it is in his contract that he can re enter the markets he was dropped from Clear Channel knows if he does it will kill their stations so they are sueing him to keep him out. This is against the contract they signed.
In a nutshell they dropped him from swing political markets when he started coming out against GWB. The FCC fine was not just due to his show so that was not a reason to drop him. They kept on air other DJ's who were fined under the blanket fine. They are fighting to keep him out of the markets they dropped him from as they know that the audience for him in those markets is huge.