Author Topic: Kerry Picks Edwards! (Read 1267 times)

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #15 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:11:37 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
You really think Cheney is gonna beat this guy in a debate? I really wonder sometimes at the bubble some folks are living in. Edwards is gonna make Cheney feel like the whole things a premature trip to the mortician.

Why do you think so?

Because Cheney is older?

Because Edwards is a young man and an intersting public speaker?

Have you ever seen Edwards debate? Delivering a good stump speech is one thing, but a contested debate is a whole different animal.

So basically what exactly are you basing this conclusion on?

Nash · « **Reply #16 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:17:10 AM »

I've seen Edwards in a number of debates. I've seen Cheney in a couple. So that's what I'm basing it on.

This is Edward's territory believe me.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #17 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:18:49 AM »

The Democratic primary debates?

muckmaw · « **Reply #18 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:19:25 AM »

Lets see what Mr. Edwards Stand for....

http://www.issues2000.org/Senate/John_Edwards.htm

Voted NO on banning partial birth abortions

"This legislation, if enacted, would ban the abortion procedure in which the physician partially delivers the fetus before completing the abortion. "

Roll back the Bush tax cuts and address real priorities.

"We need to balance the need for fiscal responsibility against the need to invest in areas like education and help for working families. I have proposed a series of measures to restore fiscal discipline. We need to roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest and restore a tax code that honors work, not wealth."

More on website....no time to post.

Nash · « **Reply #19 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:19:30 AM »

Ayup.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #20 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:20:31 AM »

Just curious why do yu follow us politics so closely?

Wanker · « **Reply #21 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:27:05 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by muckmaw
Lets see what Mr. Edwards Stand for....

http://www.issues2000.org/Senate/John_Edwards.htm

Voted NO on banning partial birth abortions

"This legislation, if enacted, would ban the abortion procedure in which the physician partially delivers the fetus before completing the abortion. "

Roll back the Bush tax cuts and address real priorities.

"We need to balance the need for fiscal responsibility against the need to invest in areas like education and help for working families. I have proposed a series of measures to restore fiscal discipline. We need to roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest and restore a tax code that honors work, not wealth."

More on website....no time to post.

Muck, I agree with you that partial-birth abortions need to be banned, but in this election the most important issue is going to be where we are going as a nation in the war on terrorism, and how that war is going to be fought, wouldn't you agree?

Based on that, Bush is a menace to our country's pretige and reputation, and must be removed from power, at almost any cost.

Nash · « **Reply #22 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:27:37 AM »

Do you want to give me a phone call and discuss me for a while? It's got nothing to do with this thread...

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #23 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:29:08 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
Do you want to give me a phone call and discuss me for a while? It's got nothing to do with this thread...

Why not.

Whats the number?

Yeager · « **Reply #24 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:31:19 AM »

the only cards Edwards can play against Cheney is physical appearance and that good old boy southern drawl. Or if Cheney has a massive heart attack.

Edwards is a good guy, hell.......I pefer Edwards over Kerry by a long margin but put Edwards up against Cheney and, unless Cheney has a really bad day, Edwards will be totally owned.

just my opinion......of course.

muckmaw · « **Reply #25 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:32:53 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by banana
Muck, I agree with you that partial-birth abortions need to be banned, but in this election the most important issue is going to be where we are going as a nation in the war on terrorism, and how that war is going to be fought, wouldn't you agree?

Based on that, Bush is a menace to our country's pretige and reputation, and must be removed from power, at almost any cost.

Our reputation and prestige in Europe?

The war on terror is the most important issue and I'd rather not leave it in the hands of a Freshman Senator who's previous job was a trial attorney and Jane Fonda's Biatch who voted to gut the intelligence community, and voted against every major weapon system we employ in said war on terror.

I could care less what the French think about us.

Nash · « **Reply #26 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:33:00 AM »

lol... I'm at work.

... but to be honest, I only open myself up to chicks and that's only if there's a chance for sex.

AKIron · « **Reply #27 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:34:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by banana
Muck, I agree with you that partial-birth abortions need to be banned, but in this election the most important issue is going to be where we are going as a nation in the war on terrorism, and how that war is going to be fought, wouldn't you agree?

Based on that, Bush is a menace to our country's pretige and reputation, and must be removed from power, at almost any cost.

Are you saying then that going after the terroists where they live is a bad thing? Perhaps an emotional round of Kumbaya would convince the terroists that we are really the same as them and we'll all live happily ever after.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #28 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:36:02 AM »

Ok.. And the point of all this was?

So again, why do you follow US politics so closely?

Wanker · « **Reply #29 on:** July 06, 2004, 10:49:23 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
Are you saying then that going after the terroists where they live is a bad thing? Perhaps an emotional round of Kumbaya would convince the terroists that we are really the same as them and we'll all live happily ever after.

That's just it, Iron. Maybe had we picked a country where the terrorists live, my feelings would be different. I don't think anyone disagreed with going into Afghanistan. But the link between Saddam and Al-Quaeda has not proven to have been true.