Author Topic: Soldiers Choose Canada (Read 3721 times)

Lizking · « **Reply #150 on:** July 11, 2004, 09:52:49 PM »

Nash, with all honesty. How can you ignore the terrorist ties to Iraq.

Terrorist raining camps-Salamon Pak
Harboring known terrorists-Abu Nidal
Supporting terrorists-Palestinian

Those are three irrefutable instances of Saddam aiding and abetting terrorists at a State level; there are many more, as if they were required.

Lizking · « **Reply #151 on:** July 11, 2004, 09:56:02 PM »

Now, in your mind put that with the fact that Saddam manufactured and used, but would not document the destruction of terroristic WMD. I can think of no other reasons required to remove him from power.

Is it because it is a hard and dirty job and people are dying? They were before and they will be after, and even though it sucks, sometimes you just have to do it. This is one of those times, and you should be happy, and proud, that we are willing to make the sacrifices in the pursuit of being left the **** alone!

Nash · « **Reply #152 on:** July 11, 2004, 09:59:57 PM »

Liz.... If I wanted to Stamp OUT! Disnelyand from everyone's conscience perhaps I would invade Botswana first because that's where the Daffy Ducks are stiched.

The ME is RIFE with terrorism, and terrorist training grounds.

Pointing out where the training grounds of some terrorists might be in country X, has scant little to do with convincing anyone that those particular training grounds are the most effective ones to be going after.

Yeah... something there.... maybe. Maaaaaybe. But, say, nothing to do with anything that's been a threat to you. Compared to others.

Meanwhile, Bin Laden is kickin' it with his bad self in his crib with his homies.

Crumpp · « **Reply #153 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:13:43 PM »

Quote

But you use this stuff to say we support an "anti-war agenda". We are not anti-war. We're anti-stupid war. We're in Afghanistan fighting terrorists. Just because we decided not to get distracted by this other war which has nothing to do with terrorism, please do not belittle our commitment

Nobody is belittling your COUNTRIES commitments so don't get defensive. I am fully aware these guys are coming back to the states and Canada is not sheltering them.

There are folks, very misguided folks, who do feel they should not face justice just because they don't believe the Iraqi war is justified. Those are the ones who would "harbor" criminals like these two. Contrary to popular fiction, if the Military had it's way we wouldn't have any more wars. We are the ones who do the bleeding and dying.

Still would want the job. You get great toys, travel, adventure sports, and a great health care plan! Just solve all the conflicts at the diplomacy table. Unfortunately life is not that way.

Crumpp

Nash · « **Reply #154 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:17:11 PM »

yeah yeah yeah neat toys and everything but YOU said that Canada is harboring US chicken*****s in accordance with an "anti-war agenda/anti-responsibility agenda."

aint the case my friend.

Lizking · « **Reply #155 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:36:26 PM »

So basically, Nash, it is ignore the hard evidence and go with how you feel? handsomehunk.

irritant · « **Reply #156 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:39:51 PM »

Gas prices are still 2 bucks a gallon.

War for oil my ass.

Nash · « **Reply #157 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:42:39 PM »

"handsomehunk" aside (I've always thought you were a thoughtfull person but alas, prolly "handsomehunk" thinking)...

When I think of the Middle East, Terrorists, and Hard Evidence I don't exactly land on Iraq. Hey, just me.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #158 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:45:28 PM »

Nash is the Canadian government moving to repatriate these fugitives?

Sandman · « **Reply #159 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:47:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by irritant
Gas prices are still 2 bucks a gallon.

War for oil my ass.

When adjusted for inflation:

http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/Gasoline_Inflation.asp

Nash · « **Reply #160 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:49:48 PM »

I have no idea Grun just what our government is doing about your glirly fighters. Google it or something.

Lizking · « **Reply #161 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:52:39 PM »

Well, Nash, you are a handsomehunk, then. I gave you three irrefutable direct links to Iraqi terrorism, and you ignore them.

Nash · « **Reply #162 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:57:36 PM »

Oh wow... You are an amazing man, Liz. Three years, a kazillion appeals to the people and a few UN presentations about the dangers of Iraqi sponsored terrorism, along with the complete lack of so called "hard evidence" and your very own US Senate calling this a bunch of bunk and the resignation of the head of the CIA and YOU, LIZ, HAVE UNEARTHED THE TRUTH.

wow dude I am in awe.

Yer right, I am a handsomehunk and I hear there's some openings at a certain intel agency.

Sandman · « **Reply #163 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:57:37 PM »

I can think of a handful of adjectives to describe Nash. "handsomehunk" isn't on my list.

Crumpp · « **Reply #164 on:** July 11, 2004, 10:57:45 PM »

Some folks fit facts their world and others adjust their world to fit the facts, Lizking.

You can see that Nash is an insightful man who does not jump to conclusions or allow his emotions to get the best of him.

Crumpp