Author Topic: alright not new planes but what new versions?  (Read 861 times)

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #15 on: July 12, 2004, 08:14:00 AM »
Fw190A-6
Yak-9M
Bf109G-14

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10908
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #16 on: July 12, 2004, 08:52:51 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by simshell
you Dolt Easyscor:rolleyes:
:rofl
Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #17 on: July 12, 2004, 12:29:10 PM »
Why the push for the Re2005? It was late war, and only 48 were delivered. Let's face it people, the Italians ONLY had a few planes in the air, and you've got a blessing already, with the c205. We should realistically ONLY have the 202 and perhaps its precursor, the c200.

Hell, the c205 only had 260 planes built. Compared to the OTHER fighters in this game, that actually deserve a presence, I'd say we've been give "gifts" enough as it is. The Ta152, the 262, the c205, the F4UC, there are a LOT of planes in this game that get a lot of flight time when, in reality, they were scarce and rarely flown when compared to the numbers of other planes out there.

If you all want *another* rare uberplane, just fly one of the rare uberplanes we have already. No need for MORE.


I would like to see fighter load-outs for the Ju88, the 109E-7 (GOD! YES! DROP TANK!!!), an early small-intaked P38, and a couple of others

But keep in mind, making "an early version" of an existing plane in no way reduces the amount of work it takes to include it in the game. So, for example, why work on a B-17E when we could have a more common bird, like the Beau, the Mitchell, or some other commonly used bomber of the same earlier time period?

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #18 on: July 12, 2004, 04:05:28 PM »
From Karnak:
P-38F or P-38G
Mosquito B.Mk IV or Mosquito B.Mk XVI
Bf109G-14
Spitfire LF.Mk VIII
B-17E or B-17F
Fw190A-2
A6M3a
N1K1-J
Yak-1

Add

1940 model of Stuka + Ju87 G1
Grand slam Lancaster
Yak-3
LaGG-3 (if that works without total remodelling)
Spitfire Mk II (100 oct with CS Screw, necessary if you have the 109 E7, hehe :D )
Sea Hurricane
Later model Seafire
and that:
"Mossie B XVI (glass nose, new cockpit, 4000lb cookie payload new FM)"   yummie
Il-10
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #19 on: July 12, 2004, 04:50:27 PM »
Hmmm.

P-38F
Yak-9M (D would "feel" better, but the M would be easier to model, or so I'm lead to believe).
A6M3

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #20 on: July 13, 2004, 03:15:18 AM »
P47N and paddleblade for the D11

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #21 on: July 13, 2004, 03:42:15 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
P47N and paddleblade for the D11


No and nada.

The D11 is nasty enough as it is. :)

A P47N has much worse climb performance and slightly lower speed than a P47M.  I'd rather have the M as a perk.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #22 on: July 13, 2004, 03:44:06 AM »
We definently need a mid war 20mm armed Yak9T class plane.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #23 on: July 13, 2004, 04:08:33 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
No and nada.

The D11 is nasty enough as it is. :)

A P47N has much worse climb performance and slightly lower speed than a P47M.  I'd rather have the M as a perk.


Not much worse. The N had better roll and dogfighting performance than the M and a much longer range. It could also carry bombs and rockets......the M only had DT's.

It was also made in numbers (1816 to be precise)

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1909
      • Blog
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #24 on: July 13, 2004, 04:17:43 AM »
Spitfire Mk XVIII
Ju-87G
Me-262A-2a
SeaHurricanes
109G14
Yak-1
Yak-3
Early War Il-2 models
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #25 on: July 13, 2004, 10:58:22 AM »
He111
FW190D11
Fw200
Ju52
109K4;)
Fw190A3!!!!!!
G4m3
Ki100?

any japanese plane that comes off the top of your head.
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #26 on: July 13, 2004, 11:41:17 AM »
Several of those are not versions of what we already have skull.

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #27 on: July 13, 2004, 11:45:45 AM »
I left this one off, mostly because I was unsure of how much it shared with the B5N, but I think the B6N would qualify as a new version, and not a new plane.

I would put this above all ofther planes.

B6N Tenzen (allied codename "Jill")

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #28 on: July 13, 2004, 11:49:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sikboy
I left this one off, mostly because I was unsure of how much it shared with the B5N, but I think the B6N would qualify as a new version, and not a new plane.

I would put this above all ofther planes.

B6N Tenzen (allied codename "Jill")

-Sik


Have any links to that plane?

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
alright not new planes but what new versions?
« Reply #29 on: July 13, 2004, 12:07:04 PM »
A quick Google search gave me this:

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/B6N%20Jill

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.