Author Topic: Schwarzenegger Calls Budget Opponents 'Girlie Men' (Read 1814 times)

demaw1 · « **Reply #60 on:** July 19, 2004, 08:08:23 PM »

Sorry red tail but this one is crossing party lines ,the people from both sides seem to be behind the gov.

dont know about n.ca.

ravells · « **Reply #61 on:** July 19, 2004, 08:11:43 PM »

I'm not Red Tail, although we do share a dusky resemblance!

If all of California is behind him then he definitely deserves an Oscar.

Ravs

demaw1 · « **Reply #62 on:** July 19, 2004, 08:16:27 PM »

/Ravell.........ahhhhhhhhhhhhh listen up I DIDNT SAY all....gees

ravells · « **Reply #63 on:** July 19, 2004, 08:19:27 PM »

oh phew..so there are some in California that can spot acting ability?

Thats a relief!

Ravs

demaw1 · « **Reply #64 on:** July 19, 2004, 09:03:02 PM »

LOL HE HE HE LOL

ah ravell first the libs. say he cant act,or not much of an actor during recall....now hes a great .....I am confused which is it?

ravells · « **Reply #65 on:** July 19, 2004, 09:11:16 PM »

I'm confused.

What are you trying to say?

ravs

Otto · « **Reply #66 on:** July 19, 2004, 09:21:46 PM »

I say that we have a 'Constitutional Amendment" that prohibits 'Girlie Men' to a 1/2 vote in National Elections...

Thanks Terminator, 'you made may day'....

lazs2 · « **Reply #67 on:** July 20, 2004, 08:32:23 AM »

rav... kinda curious... What makes you think Arnie is "acting" any more than every other politician on the planet? Arnie did not start out as an actor but most all politicians started out as lawyers and politicians.... they have been decieving people every day of their life and... there are those who will tell you that only actors who are not very talented actors end up in California politics where they become exceptional politicians. In Northern California support is very high for Arnie.

" think "socially liberal" is not referring to social programs (welfare and other money-related things). It refers to things like allowing/supporting gay marriage, eliminating censorship, eliminating victimless crime, etc.

In that sense, it is possible to be both."

perhaps... but.. gay marriage could end up costing billions and is a "social program" in that it gives money and benifiets to people. But, I see what you mean.

lazs

lazs2 · « **Reply #68 on:** July 20, 2004, 08:33:55 AM »

otto... that is probly a good idea. I have even softened on women voting and would allow them to vote on issues that do not involve crime or personal freedom.

lazs

Red Tail 444 · « **Reply #69 on:** July 20, 2004, 10:30:21 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Yea he has, and they probably have loved every second of it.

S whatif he did call them Jews?
I'd consider it a compliment.
Since when is being a frugal and shrews buisnessman a bad thing?
And since when has being a jew been a bad thing?

The only way anyone should be offended by that is if your
anti-Semitic

Being shrewd and frugal is not a bad thing, but if mr macho dislikes people he seems to label them in a most derogatory way. So if someone calls you gay, and you are offended, is that because you are homophobic?

Only a homophobe calls other men gay if he disagrees or dislikes them IMO...but the issue really isin't my last post, now, is it?

Airhead · « **Reply #70 on:** July 20, 2004, 11:06:19 AM »

Who are you calling a homophobe, Girly man?

AKIron · « **Reply #71 on:** July 20, 2004, 11:49:18 AM »

The dems response to Arnold's comment is comical and serves only to strengthen the perception that they are all girly men. Don't these politicians have advisors or at least a friend or two they might run an idea past before opening their mouth and sticking their foot in? Any politician that can speak a truth that resonates with the majority while at the same time exposing pc crap for the snare it is gets my vote. May have to revise my sig.

Gaylord · « **Reply #72 on:** July 20, 2004, 11:53:11 AM »

Give me five minutes with anyone who uses the "GM" word and I will change their sexual orientation and political persuasion.

I would like to start with Lazs.

phookat · « **Reply #73 on:** July 20, 2004, 12:43:01 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
perhaps... but.. gay marriage could end up costing billions and is a "social program" in that it gives money and benifiets to people.

Not the right way to look at it, I think. If all the gays became straight, it would also cost extra, but we wouldn't see it as a social program or additional benefits. This just levels the playing field.

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
But, I see what you mean.

For example if Arnie cuts down the religious right, I see that as socially liberal. As opposed to Ashcroft who hires people to browse porn sites to try and shut them down.

phookat · « **Reply #74 on:** July 20, 2004, 12:45:07 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Red Tail 444
So if someone calls you gay, and you are offended, is that because you are homophobic?

Yes.

Quote

Originally posted by Red Tail 444
Only a homophobe calls other men gay if he disagrees or dislikes them IMO

Unless it's a joke. Yes. It was a joke. A well-placed joke actually. He has a good sense of humor and timing. Kinda like his "I have the perfect part for you in Terminator 4" comment.