Originally posted by Pongo
Are even americans saying that shell somehow undestroyed when 10s of thousands where destroyed justifies Iraq as having MWD? The truck that was sent to destroy it was bombed by a southern watch F18 and never made it there.lol
The thing is that the definition of WMD is not up for discussion. This is really very simple.
The UN has stated that N, B or C = WMD. You can find this in UNSC resolution 687.
Sarin = C, ergo Sarin = WMD.
This is an objective fact. It is not up for discussion. Period.
I see that many people think there is another interpretation of WMD, something along the lines of WMD = justification for war. Then they apply this definition of WMD and apply it on the shells and rockets with Sarin that has been found in Iraq and they dont see the justification for war.
This part however is a subjective opinion.
"When have we found enough justification for war" is completely unrelated to "have we found WMDs in Iraq".