Originally posted by Lizking
Clear cutting is not a valid logging method, I do not think you will find anyone that disagrees with that. Selective harvest, and the clearing of undergrowth, on the other hand, while not "natural" mimic what would happen naturally.
i do, clear cut is the best way to go. you have to put in the same amount of logging roads if you cut 100 trees or 10,000. clear cuts have to stay away from rivers and streams, fires dont. for example, if you were a butcher and somebody wanted to sell you a hog but they said, you can cut out the fat but you have to leave the ham and chops how interested would you be? not me, i want the whole hog. thats the only way ill turn a profit on the deal. most people have the wrong idea when it comes to the national forest service, its suposed to promote trees for harvest, for sale of course, for the federal govt.