Originally posted by Sandman Hmmm... are you stating that a paper that has a right bias is more reliable?
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ Obviously! Of course not. Thanks on asking for the clarification! It highlights for me how hillarious it is watching MT downplay this admission of NYT coverage bias after his recent tirade against biased and unreliable news sources.
Originally posted by midnight Target If the Washington Times or some other right wing paper came out and said they were biased I would say exactly the same thing I said here....
At the core of the right wing is the fundamental belief that while everyone should have equal opportunity this does not mean that everyone should be guaranteed a comfortable lifestyle or even a minimum standard of living.
Originally posted by midnight Target Now who is commenting on a non-existant analogy?
Originally posted by Bodhi In the hopes that imbeciles like yourself might wake up... it is wishful thinking Grun
Originally posted by midnight Target Admitted liberal newspapers are more reliable than those that hide their biases, simply because they are not trying to hide anything.
Originally posted by banana And I would wager that the largest bone of contention between the two camps is whether or not everyone is getting an "equal" opportunity. How do you define equality of opportunity?
Originally posted by AKIron By simply enforcing the current discrimination laws.