Originally posted by GScholz
A man who was ordered to do so, and then came forward to let the world know what was going on, and took an active part in trying to stop the war he felt was unjustified and inhumane. Yes, I would vote for such a man (if I had the vote).
Was he wrong in coming forward and saying what was going on?
Of course he wasn't. If that's what he saw, he's OBLIGATED to present it. Further, he's obligated as an officer to not only refuse to participate, but to stop the activities. He shouldn't be in office, he should be in jail.
A man without the intestinal fortitude to refuse orders to gun down civilians and torch their villages has no business in the White House.
It's nice to expose your way of thinking, though.