Author Topic: for it or against it? (balancing) (Read 1485 times)

simshell · « **Reply #30 on:** August 14, 2004, 04:51:41 AM »

for it

you no there is more then 1 ride last time i looked

Kev367th · « **Reply #31 on:** August 14, 2004, 05:00:13 AM »

Nice idea T-Bolt - one major problem.
Side with big numbers advantage bombs the crap outta the lower numbered factories. They are in even more problems than previoulsy.

Meatwad · « **Reply #32 on:** August 14, 2004, 06:30:42 AM »

against!

xBarrelx · « **Reply #33 on:** August 14, 2004, 07:20:44 AM »

[SIZE=12]against[/SIZE]

Goth · « **Reply #34 on:** August 14, 2004, 07:31:37 AM »

Against.

Maybe the RJO can convince rook squads to move to knights sunday night and let their pilots taste this new implementation.

NoBaddy · « **Reply #35 on:** August 14, 2004, 10:26:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Goth
Against.

Maybe the RJO can convince rook squads to move to knights sunday night and let their pilots taste this new implementation.

Oh please do. WAIT! Since I don't fly much of anything with a low ENY....nevermind

.

Of course, it is interesting that you might be willing to switch countries to annoy another group of players...but, not to help balance the game play in the arena.

Boozer2 · « **Reply #36 on:** August 14, 2004, 10:53:37 AM »

I'm with nobaddy here, usually fly P-47s so I'm completely unaffected, anyway, that said... FOR (it forces some LA-7 dweebs to fly a real plane)

Hornet · « **Reply #37 on:** August 14, 2004, 11:59:17 AM »

why are so many rooks against it?

I thought their success to this point had been attributed to superior teamwork and tactics, honed during their year in the bucket?

kj714 · « **Reply #38 on:** August 14, 2004, 12:15:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Goth
Against.

Maybe the RJO can convince rook squads to move to knights sunday night and let their pilots taste this new implementation.

hehe, that would be a funny dance, then all the knits would go rook.

Oh yeah, too soon to tell. Personally, I fly the Spit V, 109 F4, 205, 109 A8 so I don't know if I'd be all that affected if this comes to knits.

killnu · « **Reply #39 on:** August 14, 2004, 12:24:18 PM »

For

if teamwork was the key to success, it shouldnt matter should it?
~S~

eilif · « **Reply #40 on:** August 14, 2004, 12:29:42 PM »

im FOR the drama on channel 200

mrniel · « **Reply #41 on:** August 14, 2004, 12:36:34 PM »

For.

Far better than time penalty, and make the game fair again for the lower side.

All against must be Rooks.

Just kidding.

DipStick · « **Reply #42 on:** August 14, 2004, 12:38:32 PM »

Oh no, waaaaaa, I'm crying so hard, waaaaaaa, I'm blubbering, waaaaaa, waaaaaa.

For so far. Worth it just to hear rookies cry and whine.

TBolt A-10 · « **Reply #43 on:** August 14, 2004, 12:41:23 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Kev367th
Nice idea T-Bolt - one major problem.
Side with big numbers advantage bombs the crap outta the lower numbered factories. They are in even more problems than previoulsy.

U have a point, but I still think it's something that could be worked out.

Re: anti-factory missions...
Mission success wouldn't come for 1-dweeb in a single shot-up bomber that lobs 6 eggs in the general direction of the factory buildings. Total mission success against factories would be quite a task.

I don't want to hi-jack this thead, though, with talk about factories.

Kev367th · « **Reply #44 on:** August 14, 2004, 05:33:18 PM »

Agreed T-Bolt.
But with NOE raids on strats its notorious difficult to get to them before they have have bit.
HQ NOE raids have proven to be a goog example.