Debate, huh?
As long as Kerry doesn't sit there and sigh every time Bush speaks, ala Gore, then it might be interesting.
Hell, even Bush admitted that he wasn't as glib as Gore. People expected Bush to fall on his face. Was good planning for the Bush camp.
Let's admit a few things...
Bush isn't swauve. He isn't really dynamic. Neither is he a visionary. He just is. Predictable even. Not a bad thing, mind you. But he's not one to do anything revolutionary when it comes to politics and government. Note: The Iraq war does not count as 'revolutionary', it was a response to a stimuli.
OTOH, what is Kerry? That seems to be the question now doesn't it. Bush is a known and predictable. What does Kerry really have to offer. He's loquacious. He can charge Bush with a number of things including not being very imaginative nor bright. But what if 'ole GW decides to push John to the mat and question exactley what he is for and how he will accomplish those goals? Remember Kerry's list of foreigner that would like him in office? 'You can't see the list', says Kerry, 'but it certainly exists.'
I hope they debate. It might make people think about third parties.