Author Topic: Thought the M8 had a better gun...  (Read 401 times)

Offline flyingaround

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
Thought the M8 had a better gun...
« on: September 08, 2004, 09:19:29 AM »
Am I wrong in remembering in AH1 that it took four shells from the M8 to kill a town building, vs. the panzer/tiger etc  taking two rounds.

Am I mistaken here?  

I was at a18 on Baltic shooting at town blds with HE rounds and it was taking 10 rounds per building.  Seems a bit silly that I drove my m8 for 20+ min dodging nme gv's and buffs to only destroy 8 buildings.
WMLute

III/JG26 9th ST WidowMakers

Offline jetb123

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1807
Re: Thought the M8 had a better gun...
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2004, 09:41:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by flyingaround
Am I wrong in remembering in AH1 that it took four shells from the M8 to kill a town building, vs. the panzer/tiger etc  taking two rounds.

Am I mistaken here?  

I was at a18 on Baltic shooting at town blds with HE rounds and it was taking 10 rounds per building.  Seems a bit silly that I drove my m8 for 20+ min dodging nme gv's and buffs to only destroy 8 buildings.
 Nope your wrong(no offense) It takes 10 shots in a M8 to kill a building. Well atleast it did in ah1 I am for sure.

Offline RTSigma

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
Thought the M8 had a better gun...
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2004, 09:47:49 PM »
Hmmmmm

Sigma of VF-17 JOLLY ROGERS

Offline Soda

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1543
      • http://members.shaw.ca/soda_p/models.htm
Thought the M8 had a better gun...
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2004, 08:26:15 AM »
ScJazz computed a bunch of the damage for different shells/guns in AH1 and as far as I know they are still accurate.  Here is what he had for GV guns (well, tank guns at least):

Gun                          lb damage/round
M8 37mm AP    15.6
M8 37mm HE    31.2
Panzer 75mm AP    78.1
Panzer 75mm HE    156.2
Tiger 88mm AP    117.1
Tiger 88mm HE    234.3