Author Topic: Bush Guard Records Finally Public (Read 927 times)

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #30 on:** September 08, 2004, 12:48:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
And I thought you could think for yourself and not just accept the corporate slanted surface BS from the big media corps....

Well you cant say I didnt warn you..

expand please?

_Schadenfreude_ · « **Reply #31 on:** September 08, 2004, 12:49:26 PM »

not bad...but wait till Kitty Kelly's book comes out ,,,,ohhh it's going to be fun!!!

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/9/4/13036/20280

SOB · « **Reply #32 on:** September 08, 2004, 12:54:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort
This is bad news for the Dems!

It showed the unit joined a "24-hour active alert mission to safeguard against surprise attack" in the southern United States beginning on Oct. 6, 1972, a mission for which Bush was not present, according to his pay records.

Bush's lone service in October was outside Texas, presumably with an Alabama unit he had permission to train with in September, October and November 1972

Hmm, now the Dems will have to try a new angle!

Not that this issue makes any difference on his ability to be the President... Where exactly did you get the "Bush's lone service in October was outside Texas, presumably with an Alabama unit he had permission to train with in September, October and November 1972" part? It certainly wasn't in the article that RPM posted. Would there happen to be any record of this "presumable" service in Alabama? If you did, it would actually make your post make sense, or at least have some credibility.

-edit- LOL, n/m, apparently RPM is copy & pasting to suite his agenda. Your post makes a lot more sense now, but the presumably is still the kicker. But again, I don't think it affects his ability to be a President in the slightest.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #33 on:** September 08, 2004, 12:54:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
expand please?

Why? You would never belive what I just found out...

rpm · « **Reply #34 on:** September 08, 2004, 12:56:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SOB
Not that this issue makes any difference on his ability to be the President... Where exactly did you get the "Bush's lone service in October was outside Texas, presumably with an Alabama unit he had permission to train with in September, October and November 1972" part? It certainly wasn't in the article that RPM posted. Would there happen to be any record of this "presumable" service in Alabama? If you did, it would actually make your post make sense, or at least have some credibility.

It is part of the original article, you have to click the link. I edited for brevity.

SOB · « **Reply #35 on:** September 08, 2004, 12:58:15 PM »

Brevity, eh.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #36 on:** September 08, 2004, 01:01:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SOB
Not that this issue makes any difference on his ability to be the President... Where exactly did you get the "Bush's lone service in October was outside Texas, presumably with an Alabama unit he had permission to train with in September, October and November 1972" part? It certainly wasn't in the article that RPM posted. Would there happen to be any record of this "presumable" service in Alabama? If you did, it would actually make your post make sense, or at least have some credibility.

-edit- LOL, n/m, apparently RPM is copy & pasting to suite his agenda. Your post makes a lot more sense now, but the presumably is still the kicker. But again, I don't think it affects his ability to be a President in the slightest.

The story is found on the net from various news services. Depending how much slanted to the left is how much the WHOLE story is left out.

rpm · « **Reply #37 on:** September 08, 2004, 01:02:21 PM »

Yes, brevity. I tried to be "fair and balanced" and give both sides response while keeping it as short as possible. If I wanted to hatchet the article I could have done a much better job. I also would not have posted the link to the entire article.

SOB · « **Reply #38 on:** September 08, 2004, 01:07:58 PM »

Heh, well I don't believe that for a second, but I suppose I could be wrong.

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #39 on:** September 08, 2004, 01:12:47 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Why? You would never belive what I just found out...

lol afraid to play? No worries.. Let me know if you change your mind and wanna let me know what:

Quote

And I thought you could think for yourself and not just accept the corporate slanted surface BS from the big media corps....

is suppose to mean. Untill then, I really dont care what you just found out.. 8)

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #40 on:** September 08, 2004, 01:14:07 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by _Schadenfreude_
not bad...but wait till Kitty Kelly's book comes out ,,,,ohhh it's going to be fun!!!

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/9/4/13036/20280

lmao Schaden.. THAT looks very promising! hehe

rpm · « **Reply #41 on:** September 08, 2004, 01:22:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SOB
Heh, well I don't believe that for a second, but I suppose I could be wrong.

Trust me on this one, SOB.

Stringer · « **Reply #42 on:** September 08, 2004, 01:29:54 PM »

I thought we were denouncing 527's last week? And we wanted to focus on current events?

It's all so confusing.

jamusta · « **Reply #43 on:** September 08, 2004, 01:33:38 PM »

I believe the reason that the drill dates were added was to show that he did drill in those months. He may have had permission to drill in Alabama he may have not had permission. The question would be, where was he assigned? Just because he got permission to drill in Alabama doesnt mean he was assigned to that unit. Now if he were still assigned to the unit in Texas when they went on alert he should have been there. Alert calls and drill weekends are two different things.

Eagler · « **Reply #44 on:** September 08, 2004, 01:34:42 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm371
...I edited for brevity.

LOL - another Michael Moore-on writer

going for best pix too? LOL