Author Topic: What, is this true???  (Read 305 times)

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
What, is this true???
« on: September 21, 2004, 12:41:25 PM »






« Last Edit: September 21, 2004, 12:43:33 PM by GRUNHERZ »

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
What, is this true???
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2004, 12:57:33 PM »
No way.

They have to be talked down by someone in a car on a normal runway because they are so hard to land.... not a chance on a CV!

And the 3rd pic it doesnt even have an arrestor hook!
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
What, is this true???
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2004, 12:58:48 PM »
Not true.


Offline narsus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 832
      • http://www.blueknightsdvb.com
What, is this true???
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2004, 01:01:45 PM »
Modification of U-2s for Aircraft Carrier Deployment
In mid-1963, the Office of Special Activities set in motion Project WHALE TALE to examine the possibility of adapting the U-2 aircraft for operations from an aircraft carrier [sentence deleted by CIA]

CIA planners believed that, if U-2s could be modified to operate from aircraft carriers, the United States could avoid the political problems involved in seeking permission to base U-2s in other nations. Kelly Johnson [lead Lockheed designer] began working on changes to the aircraft, and Office of Special Activities Deputy Director James A. Cunningham, Jr., a former Marine Corps aviator, asked the Navy for assistance.

The first test of the U-2s capability for carrier operations took place in August 1963 from the USS Kitty Hawk operating in the Pacific Ocean off San Diego, California. A U-2C, which had been loaded aboard the carrier at North Island Naval Base, took off from the flight deck with a full load of fuel and was airborne within 321 feet. No assistance from catapults was necessary. Although the takeoff was very successful, the attempted landing was not. The aircraft bounced, hit hard on one wing tip, and then just barely managed to become airborne again before reaching the end of the deck. Kelly Johnson realized that the airframe would have to be altered in order to make carrier landings possible. These alterations involved strengthening the landing gear, installing an arresting hook at the rear of the fuselage, and fitting "spoilers" on the wings to cancel the aerodynamic lift once the aircraft was over the flight deck. Aircraft thus modified were designated U-2G. While several aircraft underwent these modifications, [several words deleted by CIA] pilots began undergoing training in landing on aircraft carriers. The first successful carrier landing took place on 2 March 1964.

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq77-1.htm

damn grun beat me to it

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
What, is this true???
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2004, 01:36:52 PM »
well, goes to show what i know is a bunch of crap!:D

thats impressive....
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
What, is this true???
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2004, 01:53:03 PM »
In WWII the P-51 was tested on carriers too.  And later the C-130.