Author Topic: Just what we really need...  (Read 257 times)

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Just what we really need...
« on: September 29, 2004, 08:47:31 AM »
get back from holiday.. check announcements and...a B-24!!!!! YAY! MORE AMERICAN PLANEZ!!!

Nice job as always superfly - it looks a beauty. Choice of plane is beyond me though, how b-24 can be justified when so many other countries are un-represented / have glaring omissions. (unless its TOD related but that seems so far off that it cant be?)


its basically just a funny lookin' B-17 at the end of the day.

:(
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Just what we really need...
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2004, 10:13:13 AM »
Furball,

I think that after this long with no additions we are going to have three units that will see heavy use in the MA.  The MA is HTC's bread and butter and the new toys are very important there given that it has been aso long and these will be the flashiest units graphically for some time.

There is also the ToD aspect that you mentioned.

Although I did not advocate the B-24J, I cannot fault them for their choice when I consider all things.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: Just what we really need...
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2004, 10:33:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
(unless its TOD related but that seems so far off that it cant be?)


Pyro said as much in one of the first threads after it was introduced.

Quote
Originally Posted by Pyro
Anyway, the reason for the B-24 is ToD. ToD will be starting off primarily with a lot of 8th AF vs Luftwaffe action and therefore the heavy bomber will be central to that. The B-17 is very graphically dated since it was one of the first planes made and it had to be made under very restrictive condititions due to the system specs at the time. So we wanted something better to launch ToD. Our choice would be a B-24 or to redo the 17. The 17 is a plane that we are better off redoing from scratch rather than giving it an overhaul. Because we haven't had any new planes in quite awhile, we opted for the new plane


-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Just what we really need...
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2004, 11:18:58 AM »
With that in mind it makes sense :)

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Re: Re: Just what we really need...
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2004, 11:27:47 AM »
Quote
Originally Posted by Pyro

Anyway, the reason for the B-24 is ToD. ToD will be starting off primarily with a lot of 8th AF vs Luftwaffe action and therefore the heavy bomber will be central to that. The B-17 is very graphically dated since it was one of the first planes made and it had to be made under very restrictive condititions due to the system specs at the time. So we wanted something better to launch ToD. Our choice would be a B-24 or to redo the 17. The 17 is a plane that we are better off redoing from scratch rather than giving it an overhaul. Because we haven't had any new planes in quite awhile, we opted for the new plane



thanks for posting that sikboy, as i said i just got back from holiday - and must have missed the reasoning behind it.

Its always better to have more models in game than fewer, so kudos to HTC on their decision.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --