Author Topic: Bush vs. UN  (Read 1518 times)

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Bush vs. UN
« Reply #45 on: September 22, 2004, 09:20:56 PM »
Lemme settle this once and for all. Saddam had WMDs and did not comply with UN resolutions requiring him to destroy and account for them. Oh, and Bush didn't lie. There, that oughta put an end to all the Bush and America bashing.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline GreenCloud

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1365
Bush vs. UN
« Reply #46 on: September 22, 2004, 10:14:50 PM »
i know..slovoss is a bit hard headed...remeebr his best friend awhile back?


and sorry to dissapoint you..im not gay...but i will pound u balls deep if i get paid enuff....

and im not bald..Im a very handsome man

my pic is posted on our sqiud site feel free to touch your self slov

Love
BiGB
xoxo

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Bush vs. UN
« Reply #47 on: September 23, 2004, 08:51:35 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SLO
then ye shall reap what ye sow.....

more suicide's, more beheadings so on and so forth......

For christ sake's, hasn't the Isreal & Pal. conflict teach you anything.....


Seek Powell for help, Strong views with compassion, oh please get him in Office.....then I promise too never say anything bad about the U.S.


LMAO I had a buddy of mine make the the same type silly arguement only he said he was against it because "it would only breed a new generation that would hate us"

Like these people were somehow on the verge of loving us?

The next generation was/is going to hate us every bit as much as the last.
Either way there is/was going to be more beheadings & suicides
This has only been going on since the middle ages.
These people do not understand compassion.
they view our idea of compassion as a weakness.
That is why they film and broadcast the beheadings. To play on our sence of "compassion" for the victims.
While the rest of the world has moved to what our view of compassion is.
These people are stull stuck in the mindset of 1,000 years ago.
And have absolutely no desire whatsoever to go along with our view of progresss

The Isreal Pal situation is another matter. And I see wrong commited on both sides. I can also see and agreee with the arguements of both sides if not their methods
« Last Edit: September 23, 2004, 08:58:01 AM by DREDIOCK »
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Bush vs. UN
« Reply #48 on: September 29, 2004, 09:47:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
who lied?

the world? and you blame Bush? I see  ... :rolleyes:



Many times he stated probabilities about WMD as definates. The US intelligence services qualified their analysis of Iraq as such.

Bush took that info and said Iraq had WMD, not Iraq probably had WMD. That's misleading and a lie. He also said that two possible mobile WMD labs were WMD. No only would those labs have not been WMD, but they turned out not to be WMD labs at all.


Eagler, if you told me that you probably were going to the con, and I then told someone else that you definately were going to the con, would you consider that to be the truth, or a lie?

Offline medicboy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 666
Bush vs. UN
« Reply #49 on: September 29, 2004, 10:24:43 PM »
#1:  the UN and Kofi can kiss my arse!!!

#2:  The war with Iraq was legal and necessary, period.

#3:  The war with Iran was...er will be legal and necessary.

#4:  The war with seria will be legal and necessary.

#5:  Who's next?  I say france or canada!

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Bush vs. UN
« Reply #50 on: September 30, 2004, 08:19:33 AM »
wait a minute... we need to be accurate here.  It is an undenaible fact that the sadman did have WMD's and was working on nukes...  what was in question was if he STILL had em at the time of the invasion.

lazs