Author Topic: Kyoto and the USA  (Read 532 times)

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
Kyoto and the USA
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2004, 02:06:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
YOu mean somebody changed somebody elses mind on this BBS?


That's amazing.  It requires two intelligent people to communicate.  I didn't think it was possible here.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Kyoto and the USA
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2004, 02:08:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1
That's amazing.  It requires two intelligent people to communicate.  I didn't think it was possible here.


And one a Texan no less.....{Thump:}

Offline mora

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2351
Kyoto and the USA
« Reply #17 on: October 04, 2004, 02:16:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Kyoto leaves countries like China and India with less strict envioronental regulations while imposing harsh standards on western economies..  

This is incredibly stupid and shortsighted and practically suicidal for the west for two related reasons.

First because India and in particular China are in a stage of incredible economic and industrial growth.  Historically the period where a nation pollutes the most and creates the biggest environmental disaters.  Yet Kyoto would impose far lower standards for these explosivly growing and polluting econmoies than for the west's more stable and cleaner ones...

Second this economic growth is leading to greater competition between those countries and the west. If they are allowed under the treaty to pullute at much greater rates while the west imposes on itself these harsh regulation this will be a huge economic and cost advantage for India and China. The result will be even higher profit margins for thewm, on top of cheap labor and of course even more outsourcing to these nations from the west..

No sane western economy should submint to this Kyoto nonsense...



Maybe there should be an universal pollution limit per capita. That would leave no place for whining.

How would you guys like that?:D
« Last Edit: October 04, 2004, 02:21:56 PM by mora »

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Kyoto and the USA
« Reply #18 on: October 04, 2004, 02:24:26 PM »
per capita is good but it needs to take into consideration production per capita..... if you are nomadic camel herders in the middle of the desert you might not want the same restrictions as automobile producing factories.

lazs

Offline mora

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2351
Kyoto and the USA
« Reply #19 on: October 04, 2004, 02:30:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
per capita is good but it needs to take into consideration production per capita..... if you are nomadic camel herders in the middle of the desert you might not want the same restrictions as automobile producing factories.

lazs


Yes, productivity should be taken into account.