Author Topic: War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster  (Read 1611 times)

Offline Lizking

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2502
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #30 on: October 05, 2004, 06:51:45 PM »
Kerry says he has the solution, if he does not produce it, why wouldn't anyone blame him?

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #31 on: October 05, 2004, 06:55:47 PM »
I don't recall him saying he will create happy times over there. Could be wrong.... but I don't think so.

He's saying he has the best chance of creating happy times.

I don't like his odds either.

Offline TweetyBird

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1775
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #32 on: October 05, 2004, 07:00:48 PM »
>>If John Kerry wins in november all you ameristalkers will sing a different tune as your hero assumes gloriouis command of his old band of brothers and brings in tyhe french and germans to help us in Iraq!<<

That aint gonna happen. No matter who wins, Iraq will be a drain for the next century. The problem is, George W. will be spinnig his memoirs before the economic toll hits home.

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #33 on: October 05, 2004, 07:11:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
In your rather ludicrous analogy of WWII = Iraq War the Allies have already beaten the Axis and have occupied their territories for one and a half years. Tell me ... how do you think Germany was in 1947? Like Iraq now?

Remember, you used WWII as an analogy. Total failure in Iraq is approaching rapidly.


okay seer gscholz. give me rough date for total failure and tell me what you mean by total failure. i used the "rather ludicrous analogy of WWII" because of the similarities between germany crushing france faster than anyone thought possible. and the coalition crushing the iraqi military faster than anyone thought possible. how soon some forget what was actually said. how afghanistan would be a slaughter of the good guys. how iraq was a quagmire and how bio and chem weapons were certain to be used on coalition troops. debating much easier when actual facts can be ignored. the military attack on iraq was a sucess that exceeded almost everyones expectations. the insurgency is an entirely different situation and the only people unable to separate the two knowingly do this because they couldnt use the idiotic arguments that they choose to use if they didnt treat the military operation against iraqi govt and military and post op insurgency as one and the same. im serious about your definition of total failure in iraq and when its going to happen. let me hear it.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #34 on: October 05, 2004, 07:11:50 PM »
None of you actually think a Kerry administration in power will be saying the same things about Iraq as the Kerry campaign is saying now in trying to get itself elected and the current admistration kicked out of office...

For example when France and Germany say no to President Kerry after he asks them for help do you think he will call a press conference and say:

"My admistration has no plan for Iraq and has no Allies for Iraq and has a coalition of the coerced in Iraq and of course that's why it's the current admistration's fault that the USA has 90% of casualites and 90% of the cost... "

President John F Kerry May 15, 2005

Because thats probably the way things will be Iraq for some time to come...  

You guys like Kerry because he dont live in a "fantasy world of spin" right?  He will tell you the truth, right? You like him because you like to hear the truth about how awful it is in Iraq...  Right?

Well do you think the Kerry people will say that Iraq is a failure when the french and germans refuse to join? Nope, not a chance..  

Will the president Kerry people say Iraq is a failiure when their tulips are on the line politrically?

They will spin it and say that we " have to win" that we "must be strong" and of course that its "hard work" over there..

Will you buy it?  

Or will President Kerry's master plan for  Iraq simply boil down to blaming the Bush administartion...  Or might he just cut and run...
« Last Edit: October 05, 2004, 07:20:18 PM by GRUNHERZ »

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #35 on: October 05, 2004, 07:14:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
I am torn over whom I'd like to become/stay President of the USA. If Kerry wins he will take the fall, and the success or failure of the neocon's philosophy of pre-emptive strike and regime change will remain undecided. If Bush wins their philosophy will be debunked by the fact that they have no one else to blame for their failure in Iraq.


so youre saying that iraq will be a failure if it isnt self governing and secure in five years? if it is in seven will it still be a failure? how about ten?

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #36 on: October 05, 2004, 07:14:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
I am torn over whom I'd like to become/stay President of the USA. If Kerry wins he will take the fall, and the success or failure of the neocon's philosophy of pre-emptive strike and regime change will remain undecided. If Bush wins their philosophy will be debunked by the fact that they have no one else to blame for their failure in Iraq.


Heh... I heard somebody say recently that the Democrats should be hoping for a Bush win, and the Republicans should be hoping for a Kerry win. The next four years are going to be no cakewalk.

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #37 on: October 05, 2004, 07:17:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
Heh... I heard somebody say recently that the Democrats should be hoping for a Bush win, and the Republicans should be hoping for a Kerry win. The next four years are going to be no cakewalk.


what wise predictions. what would we do without nash to tell us that implanting a democratic republic in the heart of the middle east and keeping it secure until it can defend itself "will be no cakewalk".

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #38 on: October 05, 2004, 07:23:00 PM »
Prediction? I thought it was self evident.

It was the take on that reality that I thought was funny.

Lighten up missus.

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6142
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #39 on: October 05, 2004, 07:27:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TweetyBird
>>the logic makes [sense]. Least I fully understand what he [meant].

Nice try on the spin though <<

Its not spin at all. If the Baathists were retreating stategically (in order to form up for guerilla tactics), allowing them to do so by not modifying the attack (e.g., slow down and use more tactical forces to capture as many Baathists as possible), is a blunder and by no means a "victory."

It is my belief there weren't enough forces to to capture and hold the Baathists - thats why they were allowed to escape and reform to fight a guerilla war. Thats not spin. Claiming victory is spin.


When Bush claimed victory, he claimed it over the Iraqi army. Major combat operations had ceased. Now we are fighting against guerillas. The terrorists sure dont want us to win this one, or rebuild Iraq.
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17773
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #40 on: October 05, 2004, 07:43:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by TweetyBird
>>the logic makes [sense]. Least I fully understand what he [meant].

Nice try on the spin though <<

Its not spin at all. If the Baathists were retreating stategically (in order to form up for guerilla tactics), allowing them to do so by not modifying the attack (e.g., slow down and use more tactical forces to capture as many Baathists as possible), is a blunder and by no means a "victory."

It is my belief there weren't enough forces to to capture and hold the Baathists - thats why they were allowed to escape and reform to fight a guerilla war. Thats not spin. Claiming victory is spin.


Right. Thats what he meant so how is that logic convoluted?

OK and in a country where everyone is the same race and the enemy has taken off its uniforms and dresses like everyone else exactly how would you propose to identify the hard core Bathists from the rest of the population to capture and hold them?
Or would you just herd the entire Iraqi population into pens until you could sort each man woman and child out? After all its not like these guys were standing around with tattoos on their heads that say "Im a bad guy"

I may be wrong but I don't remember him claiming overall "victory" but rather the cessation of organized military action.

The current problem is hardly what anyone can call organized except perhaps on a very local level.
Certainly not on a national level and with no grand plan other then to harass and grab headlines

And the last I remember hearing, a great deal of these actions are being conducted (as much as 75%) not by the Iraqis but by insurgents from other countries.

Assuming for a moment you are right and the plan should have been modified, or done completely differently that would have been the call of the field commanders.
But then again this in retrospect nothing more then hindsight. And it far easier to look back and say this or that should have been done instead then to know the best course of action at the moment.
 And its easy for you or I to second guess and say this or that should have been done instead. But then again we weren't there and in control of the forces were we. and we didn't then nor do we now have all the info that was available at the time.
 And considering none of us was the man in charge there at the time we cant really say what we would have done or that you or I would not have blundered.
Hindsight is 20/20

Its a simple thing to be right in hindsight. Much harder to be right at the moment
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17773
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #41 on: October 05, 2004, 07:50:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Lizking
Kerry says he has the solution, if he does not produce it, why wouldn't anyone blame him?


Well I dunno but if I were a soldier over there right now I wouldnt be exactly be happy with or have alot of cinfidence in  a commander that tells me
"Your in the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time. But I want you to fight and bleed and die to win it anyway."

Which in a nutshell is exactly what Kerry has said

And if I were  the leader of another country I wouldnt be exactly enthusiastic about joining him in the endeavor either.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2004, 08:25:20 PM by DREDIOCK »
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #42 on: October 05, 2004, 07:51:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
1. Total failure is when the Iraq War becomes the Iraqi Civil War. I seem to have misplaced my crystal ball, so I'm afraid I cannot give you an exact date.

2. Only a fool would not realise that victory over the Iraqi military would be swift. The outcome of a war between the mightiest country on Earth and a defeated and sanctioned third-world country was a given.

3. I don't remember anyone saying "afghanistan would be a slaughter of the good guys".

4. In future encyclopaedias the entry under Iraq will be "See quagmire."




Yes, all of the above.


you may not recall it but it was said. when a couple of supply columns got lost and shot up it was "why doesnt our military protect all the supply columns". "quagmire" started popping up when advance delayed due to sand storms. and you dont remember the predictions of an "urban bloodbath" when coalition had to enter baghdad and fight "diehard republican guard units"? many predicted much higher coalition losses and a longer fight.

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #43 on: October 05, 2004, 07:52:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
You mean that the many people that disagreed and warned about this war had 20/20 foresight.


no they didnt. youre conveniently ignoring the motives and stated motives of the people against attacking iraq.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
War in Iraq - Is it a Disaster
« Reply #44 on: October 05, 2004, 07:53:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
You mean that the many people that disagreed and warned about this war had 20/20 foresight.


Damn.. I just hate it when I'm right. ;)
sand