Author Topic: Why arent the Democrats.. (Read 556 times)

rpm · « **Reply #15 on:** October 06, 2004, 08:22:31 PM »

The war on drugs is a HUGE waste of tax money.

NUKE · « **Reply #16 on:** October 06, 2004, 08:27:06 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm
The war on drugs is a HUGE waste of tax money.

agreed. We should be spending that money on a "war" against illegal aliens. Illegals are bigger problem. They influence our elections and drain our resources.

I'm sure some would say I'm racist because I want ALL illegals removed from this country though....

Eagler · « **Reply #17 on:** October 06, 2004, 08:31:37 PM »

and the alternative is??

it's working more than many would like to admit

27 Tons of Cocaine Seized From Two Vessels In Pacific

waiting for the day they are included in the war on terror - seems pretty easy to napalm production

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #18 on:** October 06, 2004, 08:36:23 PM »

I remember a comedian commenting something like this.

"the President announced we are loosing the war on drugs..
Now think about this for a minute and what this means.
this means there is a war going on, and the people on drugs,
Are WINNING IT!"

Hmmmmm
Thinking about it now perhaps Dr Timothy Leary had the right idea afterall

Sandman · « **Reply #19 on:** October 06, 2004, 08:42:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Eagler
and the alternative is??

Tax it just like alcohol and cigarettes... you know... those "legal" drugs.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #20 on:** October 07, 2004, 12:57:50 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Eagler
and the alternative is??

it's working more than many would like to admit

27 Tons of Cocaine Seized From Two Vessels In Pacific

waiting for the day they are included in the war on terror - seems pretty easy to napalm production

Nice bust.
Problem is how often does it happen?
Not nearly enough to make any real impact for any kind of extended period of time

GreenCloud · « **Reply #21 on:** October 07, 2004, 02:09:33 AM »

Bill Oreilly Had Judge Napolean..or howver his name is..

He siad that there was a point thta said..Feds could break into your house..no warrnat...and leave it like you got robbed

Brutal..I hope its not liek that

But they do need roaming wire taps

And I think they shoudl be able to Check wtf people are checking at the Library..ITS GOV OWNED!!!! Its there BOOKS.....

Now they dont need to Force Librarians to report it but...

for Illegal aliens..YES KIK THEM out..make them do legal process...And force Lettuce and other produce prices thru the roof..

$20 bucks for a salad,,,,hahahah you hippies..wait for that

Love
BiGB
xxoxo

Thrawn · « **Reply #22 on:** October 07, 2004, 03:00:59 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Eagler
waiting for the day they are included in the war on terror - seems pretty easy to napalm production

So you want to start a war with yet another country? I'm sure you will be the first on the firing line.

Eagler · « **Reply #23 on:** October 07, 2004, 05:37:37 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Thrawn
So you want to start a war with yet another country? I'm sure you will be the first on the firing line.

nope, just some napalm dropping practice

buzz the fields a couple of times to scare the workers out and burn them to the ground

crap doesn't grow over night and needs a bright sunny patch to grow, would not be hard to eradicate the majority of crops if/when we wanted to

----

or go the liberal way and start handing out ur hard earned SOMA with each paycheck

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #24 on:** October 07, 2004, 08:11:11 AM »

Just to help get this thread back on topic.
Well that and I'd really like to know also.

quote:Originally posted by ra
The recent Supreme Court ruling you mention had almost nothing to do with the Patriot Act. The main stream media strikes again.

ra

It is my understanding that one of the things in question was the under the patriot act the feds were allowed to in esence create their own search warrants without first obtaining one from a judge. And that they were also allowed under the patriot act to not only conduct searches but then to forbid the person being searched from telling anyone about it.
Including their lawyers and/or the media.

Are both of these provisions not in the patriot act? And if not
On what grounds were they used, only to be later knocked down by the high court?

Im not arguing a point here. Im asking because I dont know.

I dont see how the Feds exept under the Patriot Act felt they had the authority to conduct such searches.

enlighten me

myelo · « **Reply #25 on:** October 07, 2004, 08:20:37 AM »

"Given the government's record with the War on Poverty and the War on Drugs, we can assume that a War on Abortion would lead within five years to men having abortions."

Harry Browne

Sandman · « **Reply #26 on:** October 07, 2004, 02:33:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GreenCloud

But they do need roaming wire taps

In other words, you don't like the 4th Amendment.

-MZ- · « **Reply #27 on:** October 07, 2004, 04:18:51 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GreenCloud
for Illegal aliens..YES KIK THEM out..make them do legal process...And force Lettuce and other produce prices thru the roof..

$20 bucks for a salad,,,,hahahah you hippies..wait for that

No, we would just import it, like the monitor you are staring at, the computer you are typing on, the shirt you are wearing, etc.

Of course, that would require our representatives to stop acting like a bunch of tools for the agriculture and low wage service industries.