Author Topic: So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..  (Read 4533 times)

Offline WhiteHawk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1815
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #90 on: October 08, 2004, 05:03:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
I'm gonna go make a wepage that says Whitehawk is a lunitic. All of you free to post links to it as further evidence of whitehaks condition... Then we will ask him to prove us all wrong!

I will also make a page that says he is gay, he will have to dispove that too.

Thanks Whitehawk! Your standrsds of argument are fantastic, I can make any claim against you, cite some kook lunatic sources as evidence, call it gospel and proudly lay the burden on yoiu to disprove my lunatic accusations!

Awesome!!!

:aok


Grun herz: take yer knuckles off the floor for a second.. Exactly what claim have I made?  The bushs and the binladens association?  That has been accepted here as fact.  

BTW, i am not gay but Martlet has offered a wifey pic that you may be interested in.

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #91 on: October 08, 2004, 05:16:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by WhiteHawk
hehe martlet.. Is that yer wife?


You interested?  I could probably get you his number.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #92 on: October 08, 2004, 05:20:11 PM »
Oh yea Whitehawk I forgot, your type doesnt make "claims" you just post links to lunatic webisites that arguge what youre too chicken to say yourself. When called on it, on your lunacy that is, you just say "I didnt claim anything" and "I just feel the site is intersting - can you disprove it for me?" Of course you repeatedly find such sites, discussing the same soert of lunatic nonsense over and over.  Your supid "disprove my lunatic website theory" game is pathetic....

And whitehawk have you disproven yet that your are a lunatic and a gay?
« Last Edit: October 08, 2004, 05:23:57 PM by GRUNHERZ »

Offline Horn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #93 on: October 08, 2004, 05:31:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
horn... you are right... I have not seen the extras.

let me help you out here and give you a little advice..

if it is a film clip or anything that michell moore says then it is meant to decieve you.

have you seen any of his other films?  I learned this basic truth after his "Roger and me"  it appears that he is still fooling you.

lazs


Thanks for the advice but I'm smart enough to separate the wheat from the chaff and come to my own conclusions. Anyone deceived or fooled by the movie deserves what he gets.

I think that was one of Moore's points too: The movie should make you ask questions, look for answers on your own and see the truth of a thing rather than just be spoon-fed your views by the media.

The Condi piece was nothing more than a network feed while she answered questions. It was put in there to reinforce his point about what the Prez knew and when he knew it. It was pretty obvious--but once again I ask--Have you even seen the movie?

I saw Roger and Me (pets or meat!) but not Columbine; however, I did follow my NRA mags when the collective heads of the NRA leadership exploded after the movie was released. Much hilarity.

h

Offline WhiteHawk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1815
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #94 on: October 08, 2004, 05:31:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
horn... you are right... I have not seen the extras.

let me help you out here and give you a little advice..

if it is a film clip or anything that michell moore says then it is meant to decieve you.

have you seen any of his other films?  I learned this basic truth after his "Roger and me"  it appears that he is still fooling you.

lazs


Moores film was very sarcastic and anti-bush. There is no doubt about it.  If what he is saying is true, then he has every right to be anti bush.  Lazs, you claim he is trying to decieve us.
  Can u be specific?  Try not to post links to phone book critiques on moores movies, post the statement, then claim it is a lie.  Dont even bother to source or document it, cause grunherz will start to slobber again.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #95 on: October 08, 2004, 05:39:24 PM »
Whitehawk considers the crap he posts as documented and sourced???

:rofl :rofl

Offline Horn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #96 on: October 08, 2004, 05:41:58 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by WhiteHawk
Moores film was very sarcastic and anti-bush. There is no doubt about it.  If what he is saying is true, then he has every right to be anti bush.  Lazs, you claim he is trying to decieve us.
  Can u be specific?  Try not to post links to phone book critiques on moores movies, post the statement, then claim it is a lie.  Dont even bother to source or document it, cause grunherz will start to slobber again.


Click on the link Laz posted above. It says it "refutes" many parts of the movie but I would take it with a grain (or pound) of salt.

h

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #97 on: October 08, 2004, 06:06:58 PM »
Unreal:rolleyes:
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline WhiteHawk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1815
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #98 on: October 08, 2004, 06:08:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Oh yea Whitehawk I forgot, your type doesnt make "claims" you just post links to lunatic webisites that arguge what youre too chicken to say yourself. When called on it, on your lunacy that is, you just say "I didnt claim anything" and "I just feel the site is intersting - can you disprove it for me?" Of course you repeatedly find such sites, discussing the same soert of lunatic nonsense over and over.  Your supid "disprove my lunatic website theory" game is pathetic....

And whitehawk have you disproven yet that your are a lunatic and a gay?


Be specific grunherz.  What claim didnt I make?  :eek:

Your right, at the top of the thread I asked for information regarding the bush bin laden/saudi relationship.  I really did believe that this relationship existed, but i didnt come out and state it outright, before giving the crowd a chance to shoot down the accusation.  The acusation stands and has been accepted as fact in this thread.  Because, a) nobody has denied it and b) there is a preponderance of evidence to confirm it.  
  Then, Maybe you confuse an opinion and a question with a claim,  I ask that given there is a bin laden bush family connection  I find it suspicious that, or let me soften it for you, coincedental that another bin laden is attacking the US with Bush Jr at the helm.  Thats just me tho. I know that bin laden has 17 brothers (ive seen estimates at 60) , and given that there are 5 billion people on the earth, I realize that this would be front line believe it or not stuff.   Ive also read, but am to chicken to state, that bush sr and s bin laden were meeting at the rizt carlton hotel in DC during the attacks.  Of course, I cannot prove this and
have no credible documetntation to support it, so I didnt dare bring it up, but since you insist, there it is.
  Then, now that I am just curious at this point,  Moores movie happens to suggest that bin laden and the bushs hold big interest in some companies that stand to profit from the wars that follow, so i start to dig around and sure enuff, here is the carlyle group.  
  How much is bin laden making off of this war?  Nothing.  He was bought out shortly AFTER the attacks and BEFORE he profitted.
  Now I ask myself, and feel free to answer yourself, why would  the bin ladens sell out thier stake in carlyle, right before the big cash in?  Well, at best, it looks bad, and at worst, it is bad.  I tend to error on the side of caution when it comes to the bin laden tribe.  I only really know one of them and he was no good.
  But feel free to come to your own opinion grunherz, you dont have to believe what anybody says or writes or feels.  
   Thats what free speech is all about.  Your name calling and references are only designed to intimidate and eventually halt, my speaking freely.  Its makes it easy to understand your trust of the bin ladens.

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #99 on: October 08, 2004, 06:11:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by WhiteHawk
Be specific grunherz.  What claim didnt I make?  :eek:

Your right, at the top of the thread I asked for information regarding the bush bin laden/saudi relationship.  I really did believe that this relationship existed, but i didnt come out and state it outright, before giving the crowd a chance to shoot down the accusation.  The acusation stands and has been accepted as fact in this thread.  Because, a) nobody has denied it and b) there is a preponderance of evidence to confirm it.  
  Then, Maybe you confuse an opinion and a question with a claim,  I ask that given there is a bin laden bush family connection  I find it suspicious that, or let me soften it for you, coincedental that another bin laden is attacking the US with Bush Jr at the helm.  Thats just me tho. I know that bin laden has 17 brothers (ive seen estimates at 60) , and given that there are 5 billion people on the earth, I realize that this would be front line believe it or not stuff.   Ive also read, but am to chicken to state, that bush sr and s bin laden were meeting at the rizt carlton hotel in DC during the attacks.  Of course, I cannot prove this and
have no credible documetntation to support it, so I didnt dare bring it up, but since you insist, there it is.
  Then, now that I am just curious at this point,  Moores movie happens to suggest that bin laden and the bushs hold big interest in some companies that stand to profit from the wars that follow, so i start to dig around and sure enuff, here is the carlyle group.  
  How much is bin laden making off of this war?  Nothing.  He was bought out shortly AFTER the attacks and BEFORE he profitted.
  Now I ask myself, and feel free to answer yourself, why would  the bin ladens sell out thier stake in carlyle, right before the big cash in?  Well, at best, it looks bad, and at worst, it is bad.  I tend to error on the side of caution when it comes to the bin laden tribe.  I only really know one of them and he was no good.
  But feel free to come to your own opinion grunherz, you dont have to believe what anybody says or writes or feels.  
   Thats what free speech is all about.  Your name calling and references are only designed to intimidate and eventually halt, my speaking freely.  Its makes it easy to understand your trust of the bin ladens.


you're a looney.  An internet web page  proves it.  They have the documentation.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #100 on: October 08, 2004, 06:12:11 PM »
the peanut butter is in the kitchen and the lawn mover is out of orange juice.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #101 on: October 08, 2004, 06:17:40 PM »
Whitehawk's world:


Quote
Originally posted by WhiteHawk

Exactly what claim have I made?


Followed by...

Quote
Originally posted by WhiteHawk
What claim didnt I make?  :eek:


:eek: is right!



:rofl :rofl

Offline Horn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #102 on: October 08, 2004, 06:21:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by WhiteHawk

  Now I ask myself, and feel free to answer yourself, why would  the bin ladens sell out thier stake in carlyle, right before the big cash in?  Well, at best, it looks bad, and at worst, it is bad.  


The answer is what you might think. Those in the Carlyle Group were disturbed about the bin Laden--> Osama link after 9/11 and decided to buy out the bin Laden family's stake in Carlyle. They did it in a hurry, too. No one wanted that kind of publicity.

h

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18206
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #103 on: October 08, 2004, 07:14:45 PM »
some ppl here make it easy for me to understand why the handsomehunkcrat party thrives in this day and age

is the stupidity from youth or are you medicated, legally or illegally....
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Drunky

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2017
So I finally saw the Micheal moore movie..
« Reply #104 on: October 08, 2004, 07:32:28 PM »
Clinton allowed the WTC to be attacked.

They attacked it before, when Clinton was if office and did NOTHING to stop it.

Clinton = Hitler/Satan love child
Drunky | SubGenius
Fat Drunk Bastards
B.A.A.H. - Black Association of Aces High