Author Topic: Another Victory in the War on Drugs (Read 3300 times)

Martlet · « **Reply #165 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:00:13 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
Back for more, are we? That nap has sure reenergized ya, bunny.

And you ignore all facts period and just repeat "Well, Uncle Jed, he DID break that thar law so he deserves to be dead and all!"

Listen to a story bout a poster named martlet
didn't have a clue, he's the BB's own tardlette .....

You didn't get a defense while I was gone, I see.

Torque · « **Reply #166 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:00:15 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
I think the seatbelt law is stupid, too. You won't hear me crying if I get tagged not wearing one.

Seatbelts are stupids, have you mentioned this to NASCAR?

Martlet · « **Reply #167 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:01:25 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm
I think the majority opinion is going to go against ya here Mart.

You have no argument. None. Zero. Zip.

Repeating over and over "she killed him" while the facts plainly show the hospital was at fault doesn't make you right. It just makes you stupid.

rpm · « **Reply #168 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:03:31 AM »

Just like your "He broke the law, so what if he died". I just got tired of slapping it down over and over and over. The first time was sufficient.

Martlet · « **Reply #169 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:04:36 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm
Just like your "He broke the law, so what if he died". I just got tired of slapping it down over and over and over. The first time was sufficient.

I'm sorry, could you point out where I said "so what if he died"?

I said it wasn't the judges fault.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #170 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:10:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Torque
Seatbelts are stupids, have you mentioned this to NASCAR?

Regardless of the opinion of NASCAR, seatbelts are inanimate; they have no inherent intelligence.

rpm · « **Reply #171 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:11:03 AM »

You just did it again. The whole point is it WAS the Judges fault for not acting "reasonably within the guidelines". To try and pass the buck is where the "so what" comes from. Now get your last word in because I'm going to bed.

Arlo · « **Reply #172 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:12:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
You locked up that title with your 23rd attempt to argue your case without a single fact to back you up and ignoring the ones that prove you wrong.

Not really. You see. You're proud of your stupidity here. It's a foot-stamping "champion of all that's good over evil and white over black" (but has trouble distinguishing what's what when a certain party platform is involved) type thang.

You couldn't look at the core issue of the judge being excessive to the point of ordering a quadapelegic to a sentence that was as certain a death as her rising from behind the bench and shooting him between the eyes because you think that may be giving ground in a battle you're having with rmp here. One I merely joined in on to see exactly how far you'd take it over nothing more than party bickering.

Now that, Jethro, is as much a tragedy as anything. Especially if you have any sort of position of authority that involves the welfare of another person in real life? Hopefully that's not the case (even to the point of parenting). The party may require a human sacrifice from you to make another poli statement.

Arlo · « **Reply #173 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:13:17 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
You didn't get a defense while I was gone, I see.

You haven't developed anything substantial that requires one yet, I see.

Martlet · « **Reply #174 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:15:49 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
Not really. You see. You're proud of your stupidity here. It's a foot-stamping "champion of all that's good over evil and white over black" (but has trouble distinguishing what's what when a certain party platform is involved) type thang.

You couldn't look at the core issue of the judge being excessive to the point of ordering a quadapelegic to a sentence that was as certain a death her rising from behing the bench and shooting him between the eyes because you think that may be giving ground in a battle you're having with rmp here. One I merely joined in on to see exactly how far you'd take it over nothing more than party bickering.

Now that, Jethro, is as much a tragedy as anything. Especially if you have any sort of position of authority that involves the welfare of another person in real life? Hopefully that's not the case (even to the point of parenting). The party may require a human sacrifice from you to make another poli statement.

Ahhh, I get it. You didn't really mean to argue, you were just doing it for kicks. That's a new comeback. "I'm not really this stupid, I'm just pretending".

Now you're telling me that a hospital isn't qualified to meet his medical needs? That's rich.

Arlo · « **Reply #175 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:20:14 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
They DID have the proper facility, those that ran it wouldn't take him. THEY dropped the ball.

She did her job.

He broke the law.

"Even the Correctional Treatment Facility, a jail annex that houses many inmates with medical or security needs, would not have been able to readily care for a prisoner such as Magbie ... "

Reading is such a phundi-mental thing when it comes to forming an opinion about something we ... errr ... read, Jethro. Uncle Jed isn't gonna be happy that you played hookie in the cement pond.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #176 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:23:04 AM »

Quote

"Although you did not plead guilty to having this gun, it is just unacceptable to be riding around in a car with a loaded gun in this city."

It was the draconian gun law that killed him.

(ducks)

Martlet · « **Reply #177 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:23:25 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
"Even the Correctional Treatment Facility, a jail annex that houses many inmates with medical or security needs, would not have been able to readily care for a prisoner such as Magbie ... "

Reading is such a phundi-mental thing when it comes to forming an opinion about something we ... errr ... read, Jethro. Uncle Jed isn't gonna be happy that you played hookie in the cement pond.

Quote

Within hours, Magbie was moved to Greater Southeast Community Hospital.

The court official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the doctor believed that Magbie belonged at the hospital and pressed Greater Southeast, which handles inmate hospitalizations, to take him back. But the hospital rebuffed the request, the official said.

It certainly is.

The facts, my boy, the facts.

Something you are trying so desperately trying to ignore.

Torque · « **Reply #178 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:27:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Regardless of the opinion of NASCAR, seatbelts are inanimate; they have no inherent intelligence.

Damn you Holden Mcgroin!!!!!!

Arlo · « **Reply #179 on:** October 10, 2004, 02:29:55 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
Ahhh, I get it. You didn't really mean to argue, you were just doing it for kicks. That's a new comeback. "I'm not really this stupid, I'm just pretending".

Now you're telling me that a hospital isn't qualified to meet his medical needs? That's rich.

And you're still trying? Dunno man ... seems the more you type, the more you come off as a crackhead. Kinda ironic considering the main reason you're having a pissy-fit here.

I know you can't understand that the judge is liable for handing down too stiff a sentence to a person that was physically incapable of surviving it (with a myraid of options not only at her disposal but ... recommended ... even preferred ... by the system she was supposedly serving). Serving the system. Heh. Serving herself. Oops ... screwed up. Well that's a career that needed ending before it got this far.

You may want to double check your own logic circuits before you screw up your own life in a similar fashion. One that hopefully doesn't involve a responsibility greater than selecting the channels on a remote control.