Author Topic: Gore won't run in 2004  (Read 1522 times)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #60 on: October 13, 2004, 04:08:20 PM »
He invited Kerry to particpate in the show. Sounds fair to me.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #61 on: October 13, 2004, 04:10:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Truth in your world must be something different.


"Reporting for duty!"  (remember? ;) )

How soon you forget...

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040504/news_1n4kerry.html
« Last Edit: October 13, 2004, 04:13:16 PM by Ripsnort »

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #62 on: October 13, 2004, 04:11:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
I truly wouldn't mind if Sinclair offered Kerry 90 minutes of prime time to rebut the docudrama.


F911 is playing on pay per view the night before election, what more do you want?

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #63 on: October 13, 2004, 04:19:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Boy howdy was I wrong!..


nah you just werent fully informed. most werent. kerrys antics common knolwedge in some parts of military which equals "esoteric".

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #64 on: October 13, 2004, 05:31:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
F911 is playing on pay per view the night before election, what more do you want?


I want you to admit that there is a HUGE difference between pay-per-view and broadcast TV. (See the FCC for clarification if you like)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #65 on: October 13, 2004, 05:33:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
He invited Kerry to particpate in the show. Sounds fair to me.


Hehe..

"We're gonna hang ya John... would you like to come?"

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #66 on: October 13, 2004, 05:34:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by anonymous
nah you just werent fully informed. most werent. kerrys antics common knolwedge in some parts of military which equals "esoteric".


I wasn't wrong about Kerry, just about the depths the cons would reach to damage a war hero. sad really.

Offline anonymous

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 984
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #67 on: October 13, 2004, 05:37:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
I wasn't wrong about Kerry, just about the depths the cons would reach to damage a war hero. sad really.


you said you have respect for military i believe you. what kerry did after coming back from vn is very close to treason. he met with senior enemy leadership in secret while still commisioned officer in us military. he lied before senate in such a way as to provide enemy with propoganda while us was at war.

Offline Halo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3222
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #68 on: October 13, 2004, 05:37:57 PM »
Getting near Halloween, all this rummaging around thread graveyards.  But Toad was right -- not much Gore in 2004.
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. (Seneca, 1st century AD, et al)
Practice random acts of kindness and senseless beauty. (Anne Herbert, 1982, Sausalito, CA)
Paramedic to Perkaholics Anonymous

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #69 on: October 13, 2004, 07:24:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by anonymous
you said you have respect for military i believe you. what kerry did after coming back from vn is very close to treason. he met with senior enemy leadership in secret while still commisioned officer in us military. he lied before senate in such a way as to provide enemy with propoganda while us was at war.


Not that I agree with you, but nothing he did upon his return has anything to do with his actions in combat. You can attack his politics or his antiwar actions all you want. I just get my neck hairs in a snit when people attack a man's combat record.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #70 on: October 13, 2004, 07:30:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Not that I agree with you, but nothing he did upon his return has anything to do with his actions in combat. You can attack his politics or his antiwar actions all you want. I just get my neck hairs in a snit when people attack a man's combat record.


No, nothing he did had anything to do with HIS actions in combat...but it affected so many POW's.  This man will lose, and his combat record will be a moot point after Nov. 2nd. He turned on his fellow veterans, its time that his fellow veterans turns on him.  And they will...

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #71 on: October 13, 2004, 11:21:35 PM »
Red Herring.

Stolen Honor isn't about Kerry's war record. It's about what he did AFTER the war and how it affected US servicemen held in captivity by the NV.

As for "a hanging", maybe it's more like what Truman said about "give 'em hell, Harry".

Quote
"I never did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought
it was hell."


There's guys that know what happened in the Hanoi Hilton; they're still around and they had it happen to themselves.

Now, if some can't take the fact that Kerry's post-war activities had very negative results for American servicemen held in the Hilton.... that ain't Hell or a hanging; it's just the truth.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Silat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2536
Gore won't run in 2004
« Reply #72 on: October 14, 2004, 03:10:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
Doesn't look like a "Secret" plan at all.

"New Tax Plan May Bring Shift In Burden
Poor Could Pay A Bigger Share

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, December 16, 2002; Page A03

As the Bush administration draws up plans to simplify the tax system, it is also refining arguments for why it may be necessary to shift more of the tax load onto lower-income workers.

Economists at the Treasury Department are drafting new ways to calculate the distribution of tax burdens among different income classes, which are expected to highlight what administration officials see as a rising tax burden on the rich and a declining burden on the poor. The White House Council of Economic Advisers is also preparing a report detailing the concentration of the tax burden on the affluent and highlighting problems with the way tax burdens are calculated for the poor."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59577-2002Dec15.html


Thrawn please stop throwing facts in the mix... It disrupts those who love their party right or wrong.
As Eagler just said "I would vote for ANY republican before I voted for ANY dumbacrat "
 

              :eek:
+Silat
"The first time someone shows you who they are, believe them." — Maya Angelou
"Conservatism offers no redress for the present, and makes no preparation for the future." B. Disraeli
"All that serves labor serves the nation. All that harms labor is treason."