Author Topic: File sharing/Supreme Court ruling "But"  (Read 146 times)

Offline IK0N

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 170
File sharing/Supreme Court ruling "But"
« on: October 14, 2004, 08:21:57 PM »
The Supreme Court handed Internet services providers and privacy advocates a crucial victory yesterday when it decided to pass on an important Internet piracy case. . . .

"The recording industry may not agree, but the U.S. Supreme Court thinks personal privacy is far more important that music piracy," Red Herring reported. "On Tuesday, the high court refused to entertain an appeal of a unanimous 2003 decision by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals that held that copyright holders cannot force Internet providers to identify file sharers using a mere subpoena. Industry watchers see this as yet another blow that the recording industry has taken in its fight against online file sharing -- a fight it is slowly losing. The lawsuits in question were between New York's Verizon Internet Services and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), headquartered in Washington, D.C."

"But"
The British music industry has been granted a court order forcing internet service providers (ISPs) to reveal the names of illegal music swappers.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/3743596.stm

I wouldn't know anything about file swapping but I heard a rumor about it once...

IKON

Offline Torque

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2091
File sharing/Supreme Court ruling "But"
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2004, 09:13:52 PM »
I know nothing about masturbation, but i heard rumours about it once...

Offline doobs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1605
File sharing/Supreme Court ruling "But"
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2004, 09:26:07 PM »
Ikon don't ya have a house to rebuild before the next storm. get off the net and back to work.
R.I.P JG44
(founding XO)

68KO always remembered