HT, two key suggestions!

[Mugzeee]

Originally posted by Tilt
You can map the RPM to the throttle axis now (to combine the two) within AH

Does this only work with HOTAS? or can a combo stick be coupled as well?

[Tilt]

Originally posted by Mugzeee
Does this only work with HOTAS? or can a combo stick be coupled as well?

Sorry I did not get time to take u thru this last night Mugz.

From the clipboard........

setup>controls>select joystick

The clipboard now displays three windows entitled

AH Control.     Joystick.       Joystick Input.

First check that which ever device you use for throttle is the one highlighted in the middle window (joystick).

If it is not then click it to high light it.

Now we need to find your throttle axis.

Scroll down the AH Control window (left one) and find "throttle 1". then click on it and note which axis is now high lighted in the Joystick input window (right one). Make a note of this axis (it may be Z or something).

Now scroll down the AH Control window (left one) again and find "rpm 1".

Click it to high light it.

In the Joystick input window the word should be highlighted.

Now click and highlight the throttle axis you noted above and click the button "set input".

Click OK

Re open the select joystick page and check that both throttle and rpm are now mapped to the same input.

Leave this window and then go to the "settings" page (setup>controls>settings).

In the top left scroll the text window to RPM1. and select it. Moving your throttle should now cause this to rise and fall in the plot line chart on the right.

Note the box that allows you to invert the axis. If you find that the rpm increases as you decrease the throttle then you must tick this box to invert the rpm axis to synchronise them both.


If you are into multi engined ac then you may have to similarly map rpm 1 to 4 to the throttle. But play with just the one to start with.

[Tilt]

Originally posted by phookat
In that case, wouldn't it be true that for most of the useable RPM range, boost stays constant?  Just more gets dumped out at higher RPMs.

Varies with ac's aspiration design and altitude (ie air ambient density) as well as ac speed (air ram into the inlet duct)

Also the "efficiency" of the supercharger is not constant.

eg in an La7 below 7000 ft boost is limited to 1180mm merc (presumably by the dump valve or a restrictor control) when in WEP. As the La7 climbs above 7000 the thinning altitude means that the supercharger can no longer generate this boost pressure and MP and power drops off until an altitude is reached where it is safe to switch to the 2nd super charger speed.

Efficiency  (or the lack of it) is shown when we compare engine rpm and boost pressures.

At 7000 ft at mil power the engine RPM is 2400 and the boost pressure is 1000 mm. Yet at 7000ft at WEP RPM is 2500 and boost pressure is 1180 mm.

Boost has increased by 18% for only a 4.16% increase in rpm. Yet we see that super charger speed isat a direct ratio to engine speed and we are at an altitude where there is no excess boost to be dumped/vented.

Hence as we reduce rpm, boost pressure should fall away rapidly to a point where it is only ambient pressure plus ram air pressure.

[TBolt A-10]

Originally posted by GODO
For all the current 190s, throttle should be linked to rpm, and none of them should be allowed to operate alone.

why the 190's?  

[moot]

there was a "Kommandgerat" computer that tied everything to a few (if not single) engine controls.

See description starting with Crumpp's first post in this thread:
http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=131502&highlight=bmw+computer

In that same thread is mentionned the Kommandgerat could be overridden in all 190s A-3 and newer.

[GODO]

Originally posted by moot
In that same thread is mentionned the Kommandgerat could be overridden in all 190s A-3 and newer.

In A3 it wasnt overridable.

190A3 Kommandogerät in detail

[moot]

right, I misread that.
Thanks.

[TBolt A-10]

Originally posted by moot
there was a "Kommandgerat" computer that tied everything to a few (if not single) engine controls.

See description starting with Crumpp's first post in this thread:
http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=131502&highlight=bmw+computer

 

Interesting!  Thank you.

[Halo]

Mmmmnnnn, I thought Aces High was set up to avoid extensive engine management controls in favor of enhanced gameplay.

[Pyro]

Originally posted by Kweassa
However, in something like the Ju87 that carries just one bomb, a slip of the thumb may cause a frustrating result. There is no secondary armament in the form of guns, so the secondary fire always directly releases a bomb.

 If adding in another key is not desirable, then how about adding an  off" status between the cycling of secondary armament/ordnance?

 For instance a gamer is flyign a Ju87D with 1x 1800kg bomb. He is worried if he might slip his finger and lose the bomb. So, if the player wishes, even though the default is the "180" bomb state, he will press and cycle it to "OFF". If he wants to use the bomb, he will press again to cycle it back to "180" and use the 1800kg bomb. This seems like a simple thing to do..(I hope...)

I think I may be able to do that within the current system.  I'll give it a try and see if it works.

[MOSQ]

I'd like to see a way to tell which set of bombs are primed to drop on planes like the A-20 and Mossie. If you are carrying 500s on the wings and internally, it's easy to confuse which are set to go. It would be nice to have an indicator of which are set to drop.
In the past I've used the 250 on the wings and 500 internal system, and have practiced enough now to know as I cycle the Backspace key which bombs are which even if they are all 500s, but it can be very confusing for less experienced players.

<<<>>>

I've read many combat stories of excited pilots forgetting to flip their machine gun/cannon arming switches, pull the trigger, and nothing !

I wouldn't be surprised to see weapons arming becoming a new feature as AH continues to add realism to the simulation.

The secondary OFF is a start in that direction.

[RTSigma]

I recommend mapping the RPM control to the mouse scroll button.

[moot]

Pyro, can you also make a single button function to salvo all ordnance at once?

[Kweassa]

Thanks for checking it out Pyro

[MOSQ]

Tilt,
Thanks for the details on mapping the rpm to the throttle. I just did it, it works great. It even tracks to the EGB reccomended setting for Max Cruise ect.